Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynette Long

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 14:28, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lynette Long

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am the creator and administrator of the Lynette Long Wikipedia page. I no longer wish for this page to up. My name is Connor Grill and this page has been requested to be deleted by my person as this was an experimental page and no longer wish for it to be visible. Thank you for your time and I look forward to creating permanent Wikipedia pages in the near future. I appreciate your support on this matter. -Connor Grill, admin of Lynette Long.--Connorgrill (talk) 19:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment commented on user's talk page re WP:OWN, the possibility of Speedy G7, and the malformed AFD nomination. Meters (talk) 20:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Added {{afd2}} template. --Finngall ^talk 21:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:32, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:33, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:33, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:33, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- notable as WP:AUTHOR with wide library holdings: link and as WP:ACADEMIC for the "latchkey kids" work. Plenty of sources are available. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep by WP:AUTHOR and WorldCat alone, the nomination is not convincing for the serious case that is deletion. SwisterTwister talk 21:58, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.