Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Selection (film)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 02:59, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 02:59, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:51, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Nautural Selection (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Independent movie. No assertion of notability, and the only sources are IMDB and Twitter. Nothing worthwhile on Google. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 20:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: fails WP:FILM Toddst1 (talk) 20:33, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Clearly non-notable film; probably COI (and who knew about my trips to the bank?) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:11, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability, practically no content Hekerui (talk) 14:30, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Userfy
Deleteas currently WP:TOOSOON. As the film article is only two days old, I was going to suggest it be userfied back its author, User:WindarProd, but learned he is indef-blocked[1] (see User talk:WindarProd). Anonoynous IP 64.255.164.103 tagged it for rescue, so I stopped over and did some cleanup before coming here. As the film is in post-production, and since userfication to the author is out, might we consider WP:Incubation? It gets released and gets coverage and it might return better than ever. If it does not and it will go. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:10, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Userfy. Note, Michael, that the user was indef-blocked for username violation and is in the process of requesting an unblock to change his account name. "indefinite" does not mean "permanent." --Chris (talk) 02:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, and noted. As the editor is requesting a return a userfication will encourage good faith efforts by a new editor. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy. Note, Michael, that the user was indef-blocked for username violation and is in the process of requesting an unblock to change his account name. "indefinite" does not mean "permanent." --Chris (talk) 02:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{Rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron. SnottyWong spill the beans 22:52, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note The article under discussion here was tagged for {{Rescue}} by anonymous SPA 64.255.164.103.[2] Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:55, 13 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:NFILM. Incubation is a plausible fate for this article. SnottyWong spill the beans 22:52, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, author requests deletion (via unblock-en-l), notability not established. Guy (Help!) 07:55, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.