Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petra Skálová

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 03:18, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Petra Skálová

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article (a BLP) is unreferenced 4 years. I can't find any sources indicating notability of the subject. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 06:21, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. —Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 06:21, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SPEEDY DELETE for grossly violating our BLP policy. Enough!!!!!!! JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 08:22, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
1995 is one of the last years before the Internet took over, so I'd not be surprised if this case needs offline sources. I'm no expert on beauty contests, but wouldn't we need her to have won Miss Czechoslovakia rather than only being a finalist? If so I'd say delete as not quite notable. Ϣere SpielChequers 14:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Czechoslovakia split on 1 January 1993. I don't know if there are any notability guidelines for participants in the beauty contests. There are two competitions in the Czech Republic: Česká miss and Miss České republiky. A lot of girls participate every year in the final part of the contests. Some of the finalists became celebrities (Alena Šederová, Agáta Hanychová) even if they didn't win. They are notable for this project . However, I can't find any evidence of notability for this contestant. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:18, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the criteria we should be going by here are WP:ENT, by the way. This article definitely fails points 2 and 3, and I'm dubious about whether her stage appearances constitute "major roles in notable performances". - filelake shoe 11:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't verify any of this. Fences&Windows 13:59, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-informative and poorly done article about nothing. Carrite (talk) 18:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.