Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preciso de Ti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Preciso de Ti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod expired and it was requested to be restored. Fails WP:NALBUMS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 17:03, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 23:49, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't see the problem here. It's a real album by a notable artist. Additionally it's a large page full of sources by an artist who also has a large article with plenty of sources. This applies to many of the albums nominated below too.--ЗAНИA ^talk ^{WB talk}] 21:48, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yes, it's a real album by a notable artist. Did you read WP:NALBUMS? It states, "that an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article." It's not a large page at all actually. It's quite short. It's also not full of sources, it only has three. One source is nothing more than a track listing of everything that Diante do Trono has released. One is a self-published source by the band. The third does not discuss the album, it discusses "gospel music" sales in Brazil. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The obsession with quoting policies (see MAD) is what's wrong with Wikipedia. Discussions should take place about the worth of the article and not just an incomprehensible stream of policy links. Yes, I did read WP:NALBUMS but it was very long and tedious like most similar pages. I stopped paying attention after Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion because that just says it all. If you want something deleted argue your point rather than policies. Do you guys not realise why people get pissed off with Wikipedia so much. Just how long are you going to keep this AfD open? Maybe until someone comes along to vote delete and post a list of policies which it might violate. Yawn. --ЗAНИA ^talk ^{WB talk}] 16:11, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Discussions related to keeping or deleting an article are judged on whether they are policy-based. Feel free to make any other arguments you want, they will carry as much weight as those based on policy. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:26, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.