Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (T) St. Teresa Convent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (T) St. Teresa Convent[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Adress is given in article. Akifumii^Talk 05:10, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It Could be improved if more encyclopedia Information Is added and its better formatted. Just because the address of a place is given in a article does not mean it can't be kept, In fact it makes it better if its formatted in a infobox for example. Dudel250 (talk) 05:45, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Is this the same school as SMK Convent Taiping? Looks like it to me. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:31, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't think so, it is SJK rather than SMK and the founders are different. Philg88 ^♦talk 05:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment With such a sparsity of information it is impossible to establish context for this unreferenced article even as to what level of school it is. Nothing notable returned by Google. It should fall under CSD db-A7 but escapes because of its educational nature. Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (C) Han Ming has exactly the same issues. Philg88 ^♦talk 05:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:31, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 00:07, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 17:09, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.