Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Rivalry (Park vs Horlick) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

The Great Rivalry (Park vs Horlick)

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/The Great Rivalry (Park vs Horlick)
• Articles for deletion/The Great Rivalry (Park vs Horlick) (2nd nomination)

The Great Rivalry (Park vs Horlick) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable high school football rivalry that fails WP:NRIVALRY and WP:GNG. Per WP:NRIVALRY, no sports rivalry is inherently notable, and must satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG. That means significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources. This article has ten referenced footnoted sources; eight of the ten, however, are from the same hometown newspaper, The Journal-Times; all eight of them count as one source, and most of them are WP:ROUTINE game coverage. The ninth source is a book published by one of the two high schools, which means it is not independent of the subject, and cannot be counted for purposes of establishing notability. The tenth source is the Milwaukee Journal, but the article is primarily about the 75th anniversary of one of the high schools, and includes only an incidental (i.e. not significant) mention of the rivalry itself. Bottom line: the rivalry fails the general notability guidelines. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 02:38, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

• Delete I agree with Dirtlawyer1 Robertvincentswain (talk) 03:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
• Delete Good rivalry where I am, but in the larger scheme only of regional interest. Nate • (chatter) 08:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
• Delete Embarrassing that this made it through one AFD already... Try another wiki. --Paul McDonald (talk) 23:22, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
• Delete per noms spot on analysis. –Davey2010 • (talk)
• Delete Per nomination. Obviously fails notability. --Jersey92 (talk) 15:48, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.