Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Foxx
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:10, 28 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:10, 28 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 05:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Anthony Foxx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
For a unelected candidate to meet WP:POLITICIAN, they should show "significant coverage". I don't believe this candidate for mayor of Charlotte, NC meets that (although there was an interesting article about the improper hiring of his wife here). Also, the page has no references and reads like a resume. JaGatalk 08:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability has not been established per references and from what I can see, he fails WP:POLITICIAN. Valenciano (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 19:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.