User talk:FeralOink

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Please leave messages for me in a new section, at the end of this page.
I will usually respond here, unless asked to do otherwise. Thank you.

COVID discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in and edits about COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Johnuniq (talk) 05:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

D.E. Shaw article SPAs

Probably needs auto-confirmed page protection from apparent COI pop-up accounts. SPECIFICO talk 12:30, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

China vandals

I've looked at the history of two articles in relation to "as I keep finding Chinese IP addresses vandalizing the Stokes article, and Incomplete Bessel Functions article, and complain but no one wants to do a check user because China." and suppose that it was metaphoric satire. In any case, the argument is far fetched and if this can be helpful, CU is never run on IP addresses (no matter the provenance), but can be used with suspected accounts to compare technical information in recent enough logs, including IP address(es) they used in that period. If you suspect sockpuppetry, WP:SPI will usually be attended by independent clerks and admins who should have little to no involvement with the topic. If a page receives vandalism from multiple accounts or IP addresses, temporary semi-protection can be requested at WP:RFPP. —Paleo Neonate – 23:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PaleoNeonate! Thank you for taking me seriously and visiting my talk page. I was referring to this in particular, which I initiated. We sort of know who the Chinese editor is who is vandalizing AND self-promoting.--FeralOink (talk) 13:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok this does not look like vandalism, but is indication of WP:COI editing and indeed a problem. DMacks appears to have done the necessary when discovering accounts and the 155.69.0.0/16 IP range appears to be Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. There's still some extant stuff like this paper also added by the same IP range in 2017 (found using: insource:"Jian-Jun" "Shu")... —Paleo Neonate – 16:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neats and Scruffies

I rebuilt this article, and responded to a few of your comments. I just noticed the material you added near the top of the talk page -- this stuff is good and I will try to incorporate more of it when I get a chance. Cheers. ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 23:52, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Charles Gillingham. You did indeed rebuild the article. Neats and scruffies, and the history of AI are not my forte; I am merely a mathematical statistician and applied probability professional (not academic) so I will bow out of further involvement at this point. I left a few additional thoughts on the article talk page. Thank you for stopping by and updating me on the page status. That was courteous of you.--FeralOink (talk) 07:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for move article

Hello FeralOink, I saw that you commented on Reza Goodary's article some time ago. It's WP:N as WP:NKICK (Fighting for WBC and WMC world title). Also sources full covered WP:NWSRC. Please review again. Thank you. AriaTess (talk) 07:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Double standard?

I'm a little confused considering this article is aguably a better article than most of the others. Rolling stock is usually would warrant either a section of the system's page or a separate article entirely. The other LA metro rolling stock articles have even less info about their origins and designs than this one about a car that has yet to enter service. Most of the other articles have just a few PDFs or only first party sources. Arguably this is probably better than the majority of wikipedia articles. QuarioQuario54321 (talk) 19:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Political and Religious Sectarianism

Hi, I saw your messages on the talk page for Sectarianism article and I come to you with a question. Since in the leading section it states that sectarianism can be labelled as "political" or "religious" but the reality is more complex than that, shouldn't it be better if the corpus doesn't show that distinction? There are some cases, as the Lebanese one on which I am working, that are difficult to label as either religious or political. At the moment the article looks a bit confusing overall due to this distinction. Thanks for your answer! Ziribilla (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022 WikiProject Finance & Investment Newsletter

WikiProject Finance & Investment May 2022 Newsletter

Hi! Welcome to the May newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our second regular newsletter. You have received this because you have been added to the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to unsubscribe.

April Drive finished: The month-long April Content-creation Drive has now concluded. Our first content drive was a great start for what will be a regular feature of our Wikiproject. We will be doing them every other month, so there's none for May, but I look forward to seeing you sign up for the June edition. The drive's target was to improve Wikipedia's coverage of financial markets. Awards were given to those who participated.

June Drive topic for discussion: We're currently brainstorming topics for our June Content-creation Drive. Join the discussion here.

Content work: Two articles in our purview have received DYK nominations. Real Estate Bank of Arkansas was created and nominated by Hog Farm and Ranchlander National Bank was created and nominated by Sammi Brie. They're currently running in the WikiCup, so good luck to them! UBS has been nominated for a Good article reassessment. If you wish to help, leave comments in the nomination.

Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. — Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 10:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list page.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Finance & Investment June 2022 Newsletter

WikiProject Finance & Investment June 2022 Newsletter

Hi! Welcome to the June newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our third regular newsletter. You have received this because you have been added to the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to unsubscribe.

June Drive: The month-long June Content-creation Drive is now underway. The drive's target is to improve Wikipedia's coverage of stock exchanges. Awards will be given to everyone who improves or creates at least one article in the topic area. Sign up here!

Content work: Two articles in our purview have received DYK nominations. Google Wallet was created and nominated by InfiniteNexus and George D. Gould was created and nominated by Ktin. Ktin is currently running in the WikiCup, so good luck to him! UBS's Good Article Reassessment is still ongoing. If you wish to help, leave comments in the nomination. Cheque was selected as an Article for improvement on May 16 for one week. You can see the improvement during that period here.

Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. — — Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 07:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list page.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mikhail Lomtadze

Hello! I am writing to you as you are an experienced member of Wikipedia and in particular the WP:FINANCE project for advice. Please see the article about Mikhail Lomtadze. What advice can you give for improvement? Now there is an active discussion about the keeping or deleting. Deviloper (talk) 06:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deviloper, I regret that I did not see your message sooner. By the time I looked into it, the page had already been deleted. That is not to say I thought that BLP was worthy of inclusion, but I didn't even have a chance to review it.

If I can help you in the future with any other submissions or related matters, please do not hesitate to ask. I will be more prompt next time, I promise!--FeralOink (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit help for LRN (company)

Hi. I am contacting you because you are a member of the Business Wikiproject. I submitted proposals for updating the wiki article on LRN (company) whose main focus is advisory on business ethics, regulation, and corporate culture. Talk:LRN (company)#Request Edits November 2022.. As someone who works for the company, I have a conflict of interest and cannot make the changes myself. I have followed all WP policies to the best of my abilities. Your review of the request would be very much appreciated. Thanks. DiegoPlace6561 (talk) 17:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DiegoPlace6561. Thank you for your message. I will go have a look at your article!--FeralOink (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LRN (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortune.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An answer to your message

Hi, thanks for your civilized criticism on my talk page. I've replied there.Rich (talk) 10:53, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Approval of unverifiable pending change

Hello! I noticed that you approved a series of edits by an IPv6 IP which were reverted by an IPv4 IP who I reverted and explained on their talk page that they couldn't find any sign of the "Password Live" thing ever existing. I looked into it myself and am not seeing anything mentioning a "Password Live". May I ask why you decided to approve these edits since I'm unable to verify them and you approved them. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blaze Wolf. Yes, I approved the addition of the Password show stage in the Universal Studios, Lower Lot article. I approved it because Password is filmed at Universal Alternative Television Studios, at Universal City in Hollywood, and the Studio Tour often includes visits to shows in production. I now realize Password is not on the Lower Lot. I was wrong. Note the criteria for reviewing pending changes (emphasis mine):

The purpose of reviewing is to catch and filter out obvious inappropriate edits and vandalism on articles under pending changes protection... Reviewers do not take responsibility for the correctness of edits they accept. Reviewers are not expected to be subject experts, and their review is not a guarantee in any way of an error-free article. They are expected to have a reasonable editing history, distinguish what is and what is not vandalism... If no source is provided, you may search for one and if none is straightforward but there are no reasonable reasons to believe the new edit is vandalism, it is acceptable. It is not necessary for you to ensure compliance with the content policies on neutral point of view, verifiability and original research before accepting.

I'm sorry for the inconvenience that my review caused you.--FeralOink (talk) 05:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blaze Wolf, I edited the article. Have a look and see if it looks correct. Thank you.--FeralOink (talk) 05:40, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

THank you. I just figured I"d check with you first. I was not aware that the Studio Tour often includes visits to shows in production but saw you approved the edit. I myself would say that if a reviewer excepts an edit that is unsourced then they found a way to verify it, but if they couldn't verify it and accept it anyway that is the fault of the person who added (As long as it seems reasonable that it would exist). But that's my opinion and not in the rules. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:34, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, BlazeWolf for your courteous demeanor. I find it challenging to do Pending Change Reviews (per The Rules) due to my inclination to plunge down the rabbit hole and research everything.--FeralOink (talk) 09:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Major cryptocurrency firm article corrections and important updates

Hi, I see you’re a participant in the WikiProject for Finance and Investment and are currently active on Wikipedia. There are some corrections and important updates needed in the article about Digital Currency Group, one of the major players in cryptocurrency. I’ve started a discussion here. I have a COI, as fully disclosed on the page. Given the nature of the topic I thought this might be of interest to you as a participant in the Finance and Investment WikiProject. Thanks very much for your time. CertifiedTurtle (talk) 23:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]