Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuzzy (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems a misdirected AfD Wifione ^Message 20:22, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fuzzy (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:BASIC Fevrret (talk) 00:17, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 6. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 00:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:35, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'm trying to WP:AGF here, but someone needs to close these and other AFDs and talk to the brand new editor. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:38, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Extensive coverage exists from sources such as Trouser Press, Allmusic, CMJ New Music Monthly, Boston Phoenix, etc. These were easy to find and the nomination gives no indication that a search for coverage was undertaken prior to bringing this to AfD. --Michig (talk) 14:51, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see Allmusic, or Boston Phoenix references. Please provide them. Fevrret (talk) 01:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fevrret, User:Michig doesn't have to, a minimal amount of Googling could have done that. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.