Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaming Pillar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Icewedge (talk) 04:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shaming Pillar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to be a notable topic. Article is about two pillars, one of which is not a "shaming" pillar. There seems to be one such pillar in the world and it's not fantastically notable either: ([1]) I therefore suggest this is deleted, rather than merged, especially as the current article is so thin (the photo is nice though) but I suggest the Celje article be updated to include information about the pillar. Dweller (talk) 12:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Celje article updated. --Dweller (talk) 12:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE per nom. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 14:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep—I tend to take the view that if it exists, it exists... admittedly the article needs work, but that's OK. ╟─Treasury Tag►Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster─╢ 14:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You don't really hold that view! I exist, but I'm not notable. Cmon TT!--Dweller (talk) 15:03, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP is not a directory. (WP:NOTDIR) -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 14:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:N - Ahunt (talk) 15:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: inaccurate, the pictured pillar is actually called St. Mary's Shrine and was built on the site where a "shaming pillar" (actually a pillory) used to be.|Celje Tourist Site If anything article should be merged with pillory, as it is a humiliation device.Froggerlaura (talk) 02:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.