Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Reeve

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:01, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Reeve

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see notability here. Almost every ref is his own website. DGG ( talk ) 20:20, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's kind of pathetic when you consider that he started life on 3rd base: All that money. All those connections. All that education. Nevertheless, he has produced documentary films (one of them about Daddy) that garnered attention, and he has garnered profiles in real magazines, so he does pass GNG.ShulMaven (talk) 21:23, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You know, when you see an article like this, about a guy who gets written up in major publications whenever he comes out with a movie or a statement or attends a fundraiser - because of who his Dad was, but the coverage is real - you should hang tags on it for improvement, but not bring it to AFD.ShulMaven (talk) 21:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Subject does appear to be written about quite often. A fair number of the hits are just quotes about his father, but way way mor ethan the required two are substantial coverage. For example, [1][2][3][4]. Pinging @The Herald: who accepted this at AfC. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:31, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I don't think anyway to see him non-notable. He didn't host Guardians and NYT..The Herald : ping me 16:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets GNG. I cleaned it up a bit and added the last 2 of the sources cited above by ThaddeusB. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SNOW Keep at this point. Plenty of WP:RS about him in recent years, not just his father. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -I think this subject meets the notability guidelines head on. Maybe not the most comprehensive sources, but sources none the less to help meet the WP:GNG requirements.Canyouhearmenow 14:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.