Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 23:00, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't quite see vandalism in the edit history. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Removal of referenced information, replaced with personal opinion. Kansas Bear (talk) 23:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look like it's affecting the article too much. The IP that made that long string of edits today has stopped. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 23:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persisent disruptive editing. several IPs keep removing the upcoming movies for several reasons. NSAandGCHQ (talk) 02:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continuous addition of un/poorly referenced material to this BLP of a professional wrestler. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 03:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism from multiple IPs. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 03:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:39, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Reason: A former director keeps making accusations about the administration of the Center, falsely alleging a “takeover” and using the page to advertise his new venture. I have tried to make neutral edits that neither erase his contributions to the center nor accede to his allegations (though his need to claim anointing by the founding director goes against neutrality in my view, and his new venture is not part of the center). These accusations of “takeover” are unfounded and at least one is (Redacted). This page should be locked so that only Center staff (I am not one) can edit this page. I have tried to make neutral fixes (and in one case erroneously hyper corrected), but a voice that is taking everything very personally keeps changing to a false view of circumstances. If I were you, I would contact current director (Redacted) and ensure that whoever retains editing control fixes the false allegations and has the page locked to prevent further errors. Thank you. KeeperOfSeals (talk) 03:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- @KeeperOfSeals: That is totally not how it works. You can't lock a page so that only the subject can edit it, because: A. Its not technically possible; and B. We don't do that sort of thing on Wikipedia. I'll take a look at the issue you have raised though. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 03:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 03:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced dates. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:44, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Thesixserra (talk) 04:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Xexerss (talk) 04:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Request for semi protection. Unregistered users are insisting on inserting a photo into the lead in which the face of the subject of the biography is obscured by goggles, contrary to what a lead photo should be. A girl in Latvia (talk) 05:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism 103.27.142.111 (talk) 05:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism (even though it's funny). 1.145.4.7 (talk) 05:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two recent instances of vandalism from the same user does not merit protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page is a favourite target of MrDavr and his near-daily returning socks ([1]). Dorsetonian (talk) 05:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lightoil (talk) 05:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection. Vandalism - there have been about four reverted edits over the past five hours or so. Mario Molina is the subject of today's Google Doodle in Mexico, the US, Brazil, India, and other countries, so this article is likely to attract additional vandalism over the next day. 73.185.239.90 (talk) 05:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Just see history of the page. It was again disrupted after i restored to better version. There is continuous edit warring by ips and users. Admantine123 (talk) 05:50, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Prevent edit warring over 'age fiddling'. 73.13.254.177 (talk) 07:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Per move log. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent modifications without proper explanation and without respect of rules 212.171.134.138 (talk) 08:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. 86.146.153.121 (talk) 09:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)