Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahrenheit 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 18:43, 19 March 2023 (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (4x)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 18:43, 19 March 2023 by Legobot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (4x))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:53, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fahrenheit 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Console game. Low on info. Crystal ball gazing. Oscarthecat (talk) 21:24, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with no prejudice to recreate once the game has 3rd party reviews and such. Even if it was sourced to comply with WP:CRYSTALball, it wouldn't be for general notability. DENNIS BROWN (T) (C) 21:29, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for now - But when the game comes out, it can be recreate (as long as it is sourced) DavidWS (contribs) 00:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - recreate when significant non-press-release coverage is published (WP:N), regardless of if game has been released or not. Marasmusine (talk) 15:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Is this the source? [1] --Macrowiz (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think that link would pass WP:RS. And even the article title has a question mark, meaning it is even reported as a rumor, not a fact. DENNIS BROWN (T) (C) 21:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. --Macrowiz (talk) 18:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think that link would pass WP:RS. And even the article title has a question mark, meaning it is even reported as a rumor, not a fact. DENNIS BROWN (T) (C) 21:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Google search doesn't bring up any reliable sources. Again, I have no issue in recreating it if/when reliable sources are found. --Macrowiz (talk) 18:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice, once proper confirmation is supplied an article can be started. Even though video game articles are generated comparitively early these days (typically months before release) there has to be some meaningful content to make even a stub, we aren't in a race to slap a few sentences in an article when further down the line all the information needed will be available. Someoneanother 14:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.