Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodtimes Moving Images Ltd
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 02:39, 25 March 2023 (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (1x)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 02:39, 25 March 2023 by Legobot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (1x))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:17, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Goodtimes Moving Images Ltd[edit]
- Goodtimes Moving Images Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete - no independent reliable sources attest to the notability of this company. PROD declined with the addition of a source that is about the musical group The Bravery and seems to have little to do with this company. Otto4711 (talk) 03:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable company. A Google News Archive search returns no reliable sources. Cunard (talk) 07:07, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per User:Whpq. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-08-12t09:38z
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 20:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not notable: have checked Google News archive, Scholar and Books and can find no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. --Qwfp (talk) 21:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable sources can be found, and can be deleted per WP:RS. Mr.TrustWorthy----Got Something to Tell Me? 23:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- dELETE does not sound notable to me. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:39, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.