Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Steneosaurus

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2013 at 10:36:21 (UTC)

Support as nominator --Z 10:36, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Might be a little over-exposed, though - the flash is visible at full res. But it does serve to make the fossil very clearly delineated. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 10:44, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too soft. Barely any of it is in full focus. Dusty777 18:06, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support as Z. Alborzagros (talk) 12:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support A wonderful picture. I'm no expert in the field, but it looks like a perfect specimen, and aesthetically it's a beautifully-prepared piece of work, nicely lit and photographed. However, it does have some streaky marks caused by handling, which is a pity. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 23:25, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose While this is a very good subject for a Wikipedia photo, the photo's clarity just isn't quite good enough for FP. Try for Valued Picture instead. --Pine^✉ 05:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued picture has been dead for over a year. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support - Soft, I agree, but can't think of a better picture for the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nobody's saying that this isn't a good picture for the article but it's not FPC quality in my opinion. Cat-five t c ---- 11:35, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Might be on the limit in terms of sharpness, but has very high EV, excellent composition and is making the viewer want to know more. --ELEKHH^T 08:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File::Macrospondylus bollensis Holzmaden.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]