Jump to content

Talk:Bitcoin Cash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2601:283:4602:fe00:a888:66d4:eca7:a83 (talk) at 10:05, 31 March 2023 (→‎Update Development Section: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Update Development Section

COI disclaimer: I currently produce The Bitcoin Cash Podcast. There is no "official" bitcoin cash podcast & we are simply users with interest in the coin, but I figured I just be absolutely clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.55.189.239 (talk) 21:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed only Bitcoin Unlimited is listed under the implementation(s) section. The current node implementations are as follows: BCHN, BCHD, BU, Bitcoin Verde, & Knuth.[1] Those implementations also have much more recent releases than what is listed, including BU. BCHN is on V24.1.0, updated on May 29th, 2022[2] BCHD is on v0.19.0, updated on May 05, 2022[3] BU is on 1.10.0.0, updated on April 5th, 2022[4] Bitcoin Verde is on v2.2.0, updated on Jan 05, 2022[5] and lastly, Knuth is on v0.24.0, updated May 5th 2022[6]

Hi, we are only using high quality WP:RS for all cryptocurrency articles. Things like bloomberg, wsj, fortune.com, etc. We cannot use any contributor sources as well. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The current development section contains a single citation to a specific bitcoin unlimited release on gitlab. Should that be completely removed, then? 47.55.189.239 (talk) 21:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it could be removed, or you could just update the version. Sometimes these type of non-controversial edits dont get removed. I dont have any big objection to it if is just a version number. Or you could remove it as well if it is confusing. I personally have no idea what version the SW is on Jtbobwaysf (talk) 02:13, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There are zero mainstream articles on this subject and the quality of this Wikipedia page is suffering for it. Why not cite directly from the blockchain which nodes are being used? Surely that would be a reliable source. 2601:283:4602:FE00:A888:66D4:ECA7:A83 (talk) 10:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "nodes". bitcoincash.org. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
  2. ^ "bchn releases". gitlab. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
  3. ^ "bchd releases". github. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
  4. ^ "BU releases". gitlab. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
  5. ^ "Bitcoin Verde Releases". github. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
  6. ^ "Knuth releases". github. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
 Not done: Denied due to unreliable sourcing. Quetstar (talk) 07:24, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BSV RS

Remarkable a new CNBCTV18 source for the BSV chain. Doesnt address the claim it being the largest blockchain (if true) which would be interesting. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 07:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BSV (I think its Bitcoin Satoshi Vision) is a completely different chain and crypto currency than Bitcoin Cash. It seems off topic to this talking page. TZander (talk) 22:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Motive of fork

Would like to change the wording of fork from “fork” to “preservation fork” because the intention was to preserve the bitcoin protocol in the face of a radical change (Lightning IOU system) that is not described by the original white paper. 2601:283:4602:FE00:A888:66D4:ECA7:A83 (talk) 09:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]