Jump to content

User talk:Цйфыву

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Цйфыву (talk | contribs) at 17:10, 10 May 2023 (April 2023 2: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Boris Moiseev, R.I.P.

Greetings, Цйфыву. Please see my reply to the issue you raised on Talk:Boris Moiseev. I hope the page can be improved soon. Your input is appreciated. -- Deborahjay (talk) 14:17, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Information icon Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Буду испотзовать страницы ТЕМ Цйфыву (talk) 15:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Smallpox, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Similarly, this user removed Russia-related content without explanation in other articles,[1][2][3] while on the other hand adding uncited claims to the BLP of another Russian[4]. Wikipedia is not censored. HouseOfChange (talk) 00:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Obraztsov found a way out by introducing a “positive character” into the performance: he himself decided to lead the concert. At the insistence of officials, several more numbers were withdrawn from the program (a parody of "bourgeois" jazz, a "stencilled" impersonal choir chapel, in which the Sveshnikov choir was recognized, and a number of others), and the remaining five or six puppet numbers were enough for only one (second) section, which was called the “Puppet Concert”, and in the first section Obraztsov performed his solo concert. Point out this moment Цйфыву (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Information icon Hi Цйфыву! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Symphony No. 13 (Shostakovich) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at University of Pereslavl, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McSly (talk) 00:45, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HouseOfChange (talk) 05:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Unusual_Concert переделайте статья как здесь пожалуйста https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BA%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82
Back in 1939, Alexander Vvedensky brought his puppet play for adults "Variety Concert" to the Obraztsov Theater in Moscow. The play, at the request of Obraztsov, was revised for children and was a parody of popular concert programs and performers of those years, and the characters in it were animals. However, the production was postponed, then the war began, and Vvedensky's play remained in the theatre's archives. Between the play by Vvedensky and the “Unusual Concerto” created later, one can find many similarities in style, mood, the nature of the dramaturgy, and the parodied genres[1].
Work on the new performance began in the spring of 1944. The play was thought over for almost a year, in the fall of 1945 the first sketches of the dolls were ready, then rehearsals began. One of the directors of the play, V. A. Kusov, who hardly knew about Vvedensky's play, recalled that the script for the play was gradually formed according to the principle of a theatrical "skit". The performance-satire, created as a funny parody of the standard techniques and stereotypes of many pop concerts of that time, was called “Ordinary Concert”; the premiere took place on June 19, 1946[1][4]. The performance was a huge audience success, but three years later cultural officials banned the performance. The play, in which there was no positive hero, was accused of "slandering the Soviet stage." Obraztsov found a way out by introducing a “positive character” into the performance: he himself decided to lead the concert. At the insistence of officials, several more numbers were withdrawn from the program (a parody of "bourgeois" jazz, a "stencilled" impersonal choir chapel, in which the Sveshnikov choir was recognized, and a number of others), and the remaining five or six puppet numbers were enough for only one (second) section, which was called the “Puppet Concert”, and in the first section Obraztsov performed his solo concert.
“Twenty-two years ago, at the Central Puppet Theater under the direction of S. V. Obraztsov, a new production was released, which was called “An Ordinary Concert,” Viktor Ardov recalled. - In this performance, numbers and artists were parodied, which - alas! - often met on our stage and did not please the Soviet audience too much. The satirical portraits of such servants of the Muses were excellently executed. Each character evoked the joy of the audience, because in these figures, satirically pointed, everyone recognized other little-talented, devoid of artistic taste regulars of the concert stage ... <...> The “Ordinary-Extraordinary Concerto” found an absolutely amazing success with the public. ”[5]
In 1968, the full concerto was revived in a new version of the performance. Obraztsov changed its original name to something else - "An Extraordinary Concert". At the same time, he managed to keep the entire program unchanged, including the brilliant remarks of the entertainer (author - Alexei Bondi[5]), which were spoken by Zinovy Gerdt, sparkling humor and satirical images of all the characters[6]. The premiere of the second edition took place on March 26, 1968[4].
As of 2022, the performance is on the stage of the Puppet Theater and is very popular[4]. Цйфыву (talk) 11:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Стоп

Здравствуйте! Вы удалили текст в некоторых статьях, без объяснений и без причин. Это нарушает правила Википедии и очень грубо по отношению к другим участникам. Пожалуйста, прекратите это делать, иначе бан неизбежен. Вас уже заблокировали в русской Википедии. Ostalgia (talk) 00:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obraztsov found a way out by introducing a “positive character” into the performance: he himself decided to lead the concert. At the insistence of officials, several more numbers were withdrawn from the program (a parody of "bourgeois" jazz, a "stencilled" impersonal choir chapel, in which the Sveshnikov choir was recognized, and a number of others), and the remaining five or six puppet numbers were enough for only one (second) section, which was called the “Puppet Concert”, and in the first section Obraztsov performed his solo concert. Point out this moment Цйфыву (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply] Цйфыву (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
переделайте статья как здесь пожалуйста https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BA%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82
Back in 1939, Alexander Vvedensky brought his puppet play for adults "Variety Concert" to the Obraztsov Theater in Moscow. The play, at the request of Obraztsov, was revised for children and was a parody of popular concert programs and performers of those years, and the characters in it were animals. However, the production was postponed, then the war began, and Vvedensky's play remained in the theatre's archives. Between the play by Vvedensky and the “Unusual Concerto” created later, one can find many similarities in style, mood, the nature of the dramaturgy, and the parodied genres[1].
Work on the new performance began in the spring of 1944. The play was thought over for almost a year, in the fall of 1945 the first sketches of the dolls were ready, then rehearsals began. One of the directors of the play, V. A. Kusov, who hardly knew about Vvedensky's play, recalled that the script for the play was gradually formed according to the principle of a theatrical "skit". The performance-satire, created as a funny parody of the standard techniques and stereotypes of many pop concerts of that time, was called “Ordinary Concert”; the premiere took place on June 19, 1946[1][4]. The performance was a huge audience success, but three years later cultural officials banned the performance. The play, in which there was no positive hero, was accused of "slandering the Soviet stage." Obraztsov found a way out by introducing a “positive character” into the performance: he himself decided to lead the concert. At the insistence of officials, several more numbers were withdrawn from the program (a parody of "bourgeois" jazz, a "stencilled" impersonal choir chapel, in which the Sveshnikov choir was recognized, and a number of others), and the remaining five or six puppet numbers were enough for only one (second) section, which was called the “Puppet Concert”, and in the first section Obraztsov performed his solo concert.
“Twenty-two years ago, at the Central Puppet Theater under the direction of S. V. Obraztsov, a new production was released, which was called “An Ordinary Concert,” Viktor Ardov recalled. - In this performance, numbers and artists were parodied, which - alas! - often met on our stage and did not please the Soviet audience too much. The satirical portraits of such servants of the Muses were excellently executed. Each character evoked the joy of the audience, because in these figures, satirically pointed, everyone recognized other little-talented, devoid of artistic taste regulars of the concert stage ... <...> The “Ordinary-Extraordinary Concerto” found an absolutely amazing success with the public. ”[5]
In 1968, the full concerto was revived in a new version of the performance. Obraztsov changed its original name to something else - "An Extraordinary Concert". At the same time, he managed to keep the entire program unchanged, including the brilliant remarks of the entertainer (author - Alexei Bondi[5]), which were spoken by Zinovy Gerdt, sparkling humor and satirical images of all the characters[6]. The premiere of the second edition took place on March 26, 1968[4].
As of 2022, the performance is on the stage of the Puppet Theater and is very popular[4]. Цйфыву (talk) 11:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"The disaster was not reported in Soviet media at the time and only reached western media outlets in 1989 upon declassification. Pravda reported that the launch of the rocket was a success and did not say anything about the explosion" this is a lie, actually, at least on Russian wikipedia there is no such information, and even more so the newspaper Pravda did not report on the successful launch of the rocket, the authors made it up at all https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_Plesetsk_launch_pad_disaster Цйфыву (talk) 21:11, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komsomolsk_(film) What the hell? what does the book about Katyn have to do with the 1938 film Komsomolsk and the Siberian city of Komsomolsk itself, which, moreover, is generally indicated as a only source in the article about the film, not about the city itself or about the events in Katyn Цйфыву (talk) 21:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verkin_Institute_for_Low_Temperature_Physics_and_Engineering This is primarily a Soviet institution and not Ukrainian Цйфыву (talk) 15:46, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyiv_TV_Tower""The Soviet government ordered the engineers to shorten the tower by almost 30%, so as not to be as tall as the Moscow one" this statement is unfounded and not documented, it is only in the Ukrainian media and has a clearly nationalist character and the cemetery was closed in 1962 Цйфыву (talk) 15:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monument_to_the_Liberator_Soldier_(Kharkiv) "The monument was damaged by Russian artillery shelling on May 23, 2022" there is no link to the source and the information is confirmed so it may not be true Цйфыву (talk) 16:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budenovka there were no communist troops and communist military uniforms during the years of the civil war, there was a red army and a red army war, and Budenovka was removed not because of political reasons and not because it was too revolutionary for Stalin, but because it would be inconvenient as in frost and summer and in general was unsatisfactory during the fighting for the 30-40s 20 века https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side_cap and the cap with earflaps was not taken from the Finns, but was based on the Russian folk hat that existed in Russia, having the following regional names: earflaps (Vladimir Territory), earflaps (Kostroma province), earflaps (Vyatka land), kapelyukh, malakhai ( in particular, such a name was used in the Pskov region and Voronezh region), kuchma (fold-eared fur hat), cuff (Siberia), treukh (Pskov region, Tver region, Smolensk region (also known as treushka there), on the upper Don), treushnik (Vologda region) and Since 1931, the supply of the Red Army consisted of the so-called hat with earflaps, but with a fold-back nape that covers the ears instead of headphones.
Back in 1934, a black hat with earflaps was accepted to supply the Naval Forces of the Red Army (Navy). The hat with earflaps consists of a cap, a cloth black cap, a visor and a nape with headphones. Headphones in the lowered position are tied with a braid, and in the raised position they are tucked inside the back of the head.
In accordance with the order of the People's Commissar of the Navy No. 426 dated October 20, 1939, the cloth cap was replaced with a black leather cap, a decorative button covered with leather was added in the center at the top. For hats of senior and senior officers, black lambskin fur is used, and for hats of middle officers and long-term servicemen, black cygkey fur is used.
Since 1940, a hat with earflaps was introduced as a uniform winter headdress of the Red Army and the police. Simultaneously with the cap with earflaps, a steel helmet (helmet) SSH-40 is introduced for supply, which was worn with a balaclava, but some wore it over a cap with earflaps. Initially, such hats were made of light-colored fur sheepskin, then they began to be made gray. In the Navy, they were also introduced, but in black. During the Great Patriotic War, they were made on a mass scale, including from faux fur, which was explained by the need to meet the needs of the army Цйфыву (talk) 17:10, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Цйфыву (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 14:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.