User talk:Цйфыву

Boris Moiseev, R.I.P.

Greetings, Цйфыву. Please see my reply to the issue you raised on Talk:Boris Moiseev. I hope the page can be improved soon. Your input is appreciated. -- Deborahjay (talk) 14:17, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Буду испотзовать страницы ТЕМ Цйфыву (talk) 15:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Smallpox, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Similarly, this user removed Russia-related content without explanation in other articles,[1][2][3] while on the other hand adding uncited claims to the BLP of another Russian[4]. Wikipedia is not censored. HouseOfChange (talk) 00:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obraztsov found a way out by introducing a “positive character” into the performance: he himself decided to lead the concert. At the insistence of officials, several more numbers were withdrawn from the program (a parody of "bourgeois" jazz, a "stencilled" impersonal choir chapel, in which the Sveshnikov choir was recognized, and a number of others), and the remaining five or six puppet numbers were enough for only one (second) section, which was called the “Puppet Concert”, and in the first section Obraztsov performed his solo concert. Point out this moment Цйфыву (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hi Цйфыву! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Symphony No. 13 (Shostakovich) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at University of Pereslavl, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McSly (talk) 00:45, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HouseOfChange (talk) 05:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Unusual_Concert переделайте статья как здесь пожалуйста https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BA%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82

Back in 1939, Alexander Vvedensky brought his puppet play for adults "Variety Concert" to the Obraztsov Theater in Moscow. The play, at the request of Obraztsov, was revised for children and was a parody of popular concert programs and performers of those years, and the characters in it were animals. However, the production was postponed, then the war began, and Vvedensky's play remained in the theatre's archives. Between the play by Vvedensky and the “Unusual Concerto” created later, one can find many similarities in style, mood, the nature of the dramaturgy, and the parodied genres[1].

Work on the new performance began in the spring of 1944. The play was thought over for almost a year, in the fall of 1945 the first sketches of the dolls were ready, then rehearsals began. One of the directors of the play, V. A. Kusov, who hardly knew about Vvedensky's play, recalled that the script for the play was gradually formed according to the principle of a theatrical "skit". The performance-satire, created as a funny parody of the standard techniques and stereotypes of many pop concerts of that time, was called “Ordinary Concert”; the premiere took place on June 19, 1946[1][4]. The performance was a huge audience success, but three years later cultural officials banned the performance. The play, in which there was no positive hero, was accused of "slandering the Soviet stage." Obraztsov found a way out by introducing a “positive character” into the performance: he himself decided to lead the concert. At the insistence of officials, several more numbers were withdrawn from the program (a parody of "bourgeois" jazz, a "stencilled" impersonal choir chapel, in which the Sveshnikov choir was recognized, and a number of others), and the remaining five or six puppet numbers were enough for only one (second) section, which was called the “Puppet Concert”, and in the first section Obraztsov performed his solo concert.

“Twenty-two years ago, at the Central Puppet Theater under the direction of S. V. Obraztsov, a new production was released, which was called “An Ordinary Concert,” Viktor Ardov recalled. - In this performance, numbers and artists were parodied, which - alas! - often met on our stage and did not please the Soviet audience too much. The satirical portraits of such servants of the Muses were excellently executed. Each character evoked the joy of the audience, because in these figures, satirically pointed, everyone recognized other little-talented, devoid of artistic taste regulars of the concert stage ... <...> The “Ordinary-Extraordinary Concerto” found an absolutely amazing success with the public. ”[5]

In 1968, the full concerto was revived in a new version of the performance. Obraztsov changed its original name to something else - "An Extraordinary Concert". At the same time, he managed to keep the entire program unchanged, including the brilliant remarks of the entertainer (author - Alexei Bondi[5]), which were spoken by Zinovy Gerdt, sparkling humor and satirical images of all the characters[6]. The premiere of the second edition took place on March 26, 1968[4].

As of 2022, the performance is on the stage of the Puppet Theater and is very popular[4]. Цйфыву (talk) 11:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Secret_and_Explicit_(The_Aims_and_Acts_of_Zionists)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HouseOfChange Why are you lying? An article on Russian Wikipedia has a similar statement, it directly says что The film Secret and Explicit (The Aims and Acts of Zionists) was banned from wide release due to scandalous language. Oleg Platonov, referring to the filmmakers Karpov and Zhukov, writes that the film was banned by Yuri Andropov and KGB General Philip Bobkov. He writes that Karpov took out an abbreviated version of the film from the editing room, which was then shown at the apartments of "some high-ranking officials of the Russian leadership"Once again I repeat the film was banned from showing please write this in the film Цйфыву (talk) 08:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC) Цйфыву (talk) 08:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Secret_and_Explicit_(The_Aims_and_Acts_of_Zionists)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HouseOfChange Why are you lying? An article on Russian Wikipedia has a similar statement, it directly says что The film Secret and Explicit (The Aims and Acts of Zionists) was banned from wide release due to scandalous language. Oleg Platonov, referring to the filmmakers Karpov and Zhukov, writes that the film was banned by Yuri Andropov and KGB General Philip Bobkov. He writes that Karpov took out an abbreviated version of the film from the editing room, which was then shown at the apartments of "some high-ranking officials of the Russian leadership"Once again I repeat the film was banned from showing please write this in the film Цйфыву (talk) 08:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC) Цйфыву (talk) 08:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC) Цйфыву (talk) 08:07, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Стоп

Здравствуйте! Вы удалили текст в некоторых статьях, без объяснений и без причин. Это нарушает правила Википедии и очень грубо по отношению к другим участникам. Пожалуйста, прекратите это делать, иначе бан неизбежен. Вас уже заблокировали в русской Википедии. Ostalgia (talk) 00:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obraztsov found a way out by introducing a “positive character” into the performance: he himself decided to lead the concert. At the insistence of officials, several more numbers were withdrawn from the program (a parody of "bourgeois" jazz, a "stencilled" impersonal choir chapel, in which the Sveshnikov choir was recognized, and a number of others), and the remaining five or six puppet numbers were enough for only one (second) section, which was called the “Puppet Concert”, and in the first section Obraztsov performed his solo concert. Point out this moment Цйфыву (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply] Цйфыву (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

переделайте статья как здесь пожалуйста https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BA%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82

Back in 1939, Alexander Vvedensky brought his puppet play for adults "Variety Concert" to the Obraztsov Theater in Moscow. The play, at the request of Obraztsov, was revised for children and was a parody of popular concert programs and performers of those years, and the characters in it were animals. However, the production was postponed, then the war began, and Vvedensky's play remained in the theatre's archives. Between the play by Vvedensky and the “Unusual Concerto” created later, one can find many similarities in style, mood, the nature of the dramaturgy, and the parodied genres[1].

Work on the new performance began in the spring of 1944. The play was thought over for almost a year, in the fall of 1945 the first sketches of the dolls were ready, then rehearsals began. One of the directors of the play, V. A. Kusov, who hardly knew about Vvedensky's play, recalled that the script for the play was gradually formed according to the principle of a theatrical "skit". The performance-satire, created as a funny parody of the standard techniques and stereotypes of many pop concerts of that time, was called “Ordinary Concert”; the premiere took place on June 19, 1946[1][4]. The performance was a huge audience success, but three years later cultural officials banned the performance. The play, in which there was no positive hero, was accused of "slandering the Soviet stage." Obraztsov found a way out by introducing a “positive character” into the performance: he himself decided to lead the concert. At the insistence of officials, several more numbers were withdrawn from the program (a parody of "bourgeois" jazz, a "stencilled" impersonal choir chapel, in which the Sveshnikov choir was recognized, and a number of others), and the remaining five or six puppet numbers were enough for only one (second) section, which was called the “Puppet Concert”, and in the first section Obraztsov performed his solo concert.

“Twenty-two years ago, at the Central Puppet Theater under the direction of S. V. Obraztsov, a new production was released, which was called “An Ordinary Concert,” Viktor Ardov recalled. - In this performance, numbers and artists were parodied, which - alas! - often met on our stage and did not please the Soviet audience too much. The satirical portraits of such servants of the Muses were excellently executed. Each character evoked the joy of the audience, because in these figures, satirically pointed, everyone recognized other little-talented, devoid of artistic taste regulars of the concert stage ... <...> The “Ordinary-Extraordinary Concerto” found an absolutely amazing success with the public. ”[5]

In 1968, the full concerto was revived in a new version of the performance. Obraztsov changed its original name to something else - "An Extraordinary Concert". At the same time, he managed to keep the entire program unchanged, including the brilliant remarks of the entertainer (author - Alexei Bondi[5]), which were spoken by Zinovy Gerdt, sparkling humor and satirical images of all the characters[6]. The premiere of the second edition took place on March 26, 1968[4].

As of 2022, the performance is on the stage of the Puppet Theater and is very popular[4]. Цйфыву (talk) 11:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The disaster was not reported in Soviet media at the time and only reached western media outlets in 1989 upon declassification. Pravda reported that the launch of the rocket was a success and did not say anything about the explosion" this is a lie, actually, at least on Russian wikipedia there is no such information, and even more so the newspaper Pravda did not report on the successful launch of the rocket, the authors made it up at all https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_Plesetsk_launch_pad_disaster Цйфыву (talk) 21:11, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komsomolsk_(film) What the hell? what does the book about Katyn have to do with the 1938 film Komsomolsk and the Siberian city of Komsomolsk itself, which, moreover, is generally indicated as a only source in the article about the film, not about the city itself or about the events in Katyn Цйфыву (talk) 21:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verkin_Institute_for_Low_Temperature_Physics_and_Engineering This is primarily a Soviet institution and not Ukrainian Цйфыву (talk) 15:46, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyiv_TV_Tower""The Soviet government ordered the engineers to shorten the tower by almost 30%, so as not to be as tall as the Moscow one" this statement is unfounded and not documented, it is only in the Ukrainian media and has a clearly nationalist character and the cemetery was closed in 1962 Цйфыву (talk) 15:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monument_to_the_Liberator_Soldier_(Kharkiv) "The monument was damaged by Russian artillery shelling on May 23, 2022" there is no link to the source and the information is confirmed so it may not be true Цйфыву (talk) 16:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budenovka there were no communist troops and communist military uniforms during the years of the civil war, there was a red army and a red army war, and Budenovka was removed not because of political reasons and not because it was too revolutionary for Stalin, but because it would be inconvenient as in frost and summer and in general was unsatisfactory during the fighting for the 30-40s 20 века https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side_cap and the cap with earflaps was not taken from the Finns, but was based on the Russian folk hat that existed in Russia, having the following regional names: earflaps (Vladimir Territory), earflaps (Kostroma province), earflaps (Vyatka land), kapelyukh, malakhai ( in particular, such a name was used in the Pskov region and Voronezh region), kuchma (fold-eared fur hat), cuff (Siberia), treukh (Pskov region, Tver region, Smolensk region (also known as treushka there), on the upper Don), treushnik (Vologda region) and Since 1931, the supply of the Red Army consisted of the so-called hat with earflaps, but with a fold-back nape that covers the ears instead of headphones.

Back in 1934, a black hat with earflaps was accepted to supply the Naval Forces of the Red Army (Navy). The hat with earflaps consists of a cap, a cloth black cap, a visor and a nape with headphones. Headphones in the lowered position are tied with a braid, and in the raised position they are tucked inside the back of the head.

In accordance with the order of the People's Commissar of the Navy No. 426 dated October 20, 1939, the cloth cap was replaced with a black leather cap, a decorative button covered with leather was added in the center at the top. For hats of senior and senior officers, black lambskin fur is used, and for hats of middle officers and long-term servicemen, black cygkey fur is used.

Since 1940, a hat with earflaps was introduced as a uniform winter headdress of the Red Army and the police. Simultaneously with the cap with earflaps, a steel helmet (helmet) SSH-40 is introduced for supply, which was worn with a balaclava, but some wore it over a cap with earflaps. Initially, such hats were made of light-colored fur sheepskin, then they began to be made gray. In the Navy, they were also introduced, but in black. During the Great Patriotic War, they were made on a mass scale, including from faux fur, which was explained by the need to meet the needs of the army Цйфыву (talk) 17:10, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nona_Gaprindashvili Indicate in the article a complete list of her awards Labor Achievement Medal (1963)

Honored Master of Sports of the USSR (1964)

Medal "For Labor Distinction" (1965)

Order of Lenin (1966)

Athlete of the Year in the GSSR (1969)

Athlete of the Year in the GSSR (1975)

Honored Worker of Physical Culture and Sports of the Georgian SSR (1981)

Order of the Badge of Honor (1985)

Order of Honor (1994)

Order of Vakhtang Gorgasal II degree (1999)

Order of Vakhtang Gorgasal I degree (2001)

Presidential Order "Radiance" (Georgia, 2015)

The best athlete of Georgia of the XX century

Honorary Citizen of Tbilisi, Batumi and Zugdidi Цйфыву (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Karetnikov "However, the authorities found the music unacceptable. It was criticized, and then banned from the performances in the Soviet Union fordecades" This is a lie, firstly, no "authorities" criticized him, his union of composers criticized, that is, the conscientious composers themselves criticized him and there was no ban on him, he himself left the opera after many years of criticism for ideological and artistic reasons, as well as records Till Eulenspiegel and The Mystery of the Apostle Paul were not underground since they were made during the years of perestroika due to the death of Georgy Efros,who was supposed to put them Цйфыву (talk) 11:57, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Till Eulenspiegel Karetnikov,were recorded during the years of perestroika and were not published due to со due to the death of Georgy Efros, who was supposed to put them Цйфыву (talk) 11:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F and author this nonsense https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F:%D0%92%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4/176.37.192.236 author this nonsense,is everything all right with you head? Is there at least one document confirming that such a crazy name was serious be, it’s just a journalistic fiction, unsubstantiated and invented in emigration, and even if such a name was real, they removed it because it just sounds stupid and nothing more and in soviet literature they didn’t remind about this because there was no such thing at all, and if it was, then this is an insignificant and unnecessary fact Цйфыву (talk) 15:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%8B_%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%B8 another rubbish from @176.37.192.23 6what kind of campaigns of the Red Army? what kind of nonsense is this in general, you still call the war in Afghanistan or the battles of the Great Patriotic War "campaigns", although here for some reason the winter war (1939) is called the Finnish campaign "and this war definitely was not a failure, all the same to As many as 11 percent of the territories of Finland retreated to the USSR and there was no "failed campaign against Poland" in 1919, the conflict began largely through the fault of the Polish side, just as there was no campaign against the Baltic states either, there was just a western campaign of the Red Army in which there were both successes in the type of annexation of Ukraine and Belarus (which for some reason are not indicated in the article), and failures in the type of battles of the Baltic states in which the local population directly participated in the type of Latvian shooters, Red Army soldiers of Ukrainians and Belarussians and in the Baltic states to the local German Landsweer and Russian units Bermondt-Avalov, Rodzianko and Yudenich Цйфыву (talk) 18:27, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrier_of_the_Unknown https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8C%D0%B5%D1%80_%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8 nonsense in both articles, why in the story about Soviet experimental aircraft do you need a link to American articles from the Cold War, how could they both know about Soviet developments if they did not have access to Soviet materials and what is the basis for the fact that all the features of the cyclone aircraft are made on the basis of an American aircraft x -15, what kind of proof of this will be? Цйфыву (talk) 19:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B1%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F

@176.37.192.23 wrote nonsense again,why should the USSR be embarrassed by their own military exercises? Well, the American exercises should be alarming because this is a hostile state, well, who is it possible for this and the Borisoglebsk events, these were military exercises conducted in response to NATO military exercises Цйфыву (talk) 22:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2,_%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80_%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 фильм The Ugly Story 1966 year could be declared in the USSR "a libel that discredits the entire nation and its historical past" if in the USSR one of the ideological foundations was criticism of the tsarist and autocratic past, and this film could not be banned in any way because of allusions to the USSR, since then it would have to be banned a little whether not all agitational propaganda against tsarism and chauvinism, well, this is not documented in any way, that is, this is an unsubstantiated statementутверждение,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Naumov where did you get the idea that the script of the film The Choice (1987) was banned, and even more so for 20 years, there are no links or any documentary evidence in the article, and there is nothing like that in the article about the film itself on Russian Wikipedia there is nothing like it Цйфыву (talk) 19:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D1%8F%D1%82_%D1%83%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%B8%D0%B3%D1%80%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Valentina Bondarenko is nonsense, I don’t know why her opinion was brought in the article as authoritative and why all of a sudden “all people should sleep at night” should somehow give the baby “value categories of adult existence”, this is a simple lullaby, the baby does not even understand them, yes and the verse is in different editions in separate editions, these lines and whole couplets are missing, and again, in the text of the oscillatory there is a story about the house and about the world around us, and Russian folk oscillators were different, some differed from this Ostrovsky lullaby, and some were closer to this lullaby of Ostrovsky Цйфыву (talk) 23:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PPSh-41 for the most part, Finland has nothing to do with drum magazines and the PPSh device. Such submachine guns were made in the USSR back in the 20s and in terms of device they rather resembled Thompson submachine guns, but they were not copies of it from the word completely Цйфыву (talk) 23:41, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steppe_Dawns why there is only an article about this film and no article about other films of the director Lev Saakov и what's the attitude of this wikipedia author https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:%D0%A7%D1%80%D1%8A%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BA he is attached to this film, given the fact that his main activity on Wikipedia is the coverage of Orthodoxy, not to mention the fact that he did not completely and incorrectly translate the article from Russian Wikipedia Цйфыву (talk) 17:38, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Krutov no need to lie, he was not the first to cover the Chernobyl disaster, before him many people did this in the USSR Цйфыву (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sino-Vietnamese_War#Copyright_problem_removed and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mztourist because I can answer and therefore I answer and

this is not true, about the fact that supposedly the USSR could not help Vietnam in this war and for the most part it was invented by Bruce Elleman himself, the USSR already supported Vietnam and helped it in this war and indirectly participated in it, he while the Soviet General Gennady Ivanovich Obaturov, who played one of the most important roles in repelling Chinese aggression in Vietnam and the Soviet fleet also provided quite serious assistance to Vietnam, the ships of the Pacific Fleet of the USSR since the summer of 1978 were in the South China and East) Цйфыву (talk) 07:47, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Secret_and_Explicit_(The_Aims_and_Acts_of_Zionists)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HouseOfChange Why are you lying? An article on Russian Wikipedia has a similar statement, it directly says что The film Secret and Explicit (The Aims and Acts of Zionists) was banned from wide release due to scandalous language. Oleg Platonov, referring to the filmmakers Karpov and Zhukov, writes that the film was banned by Yuri Andropov and KGB General Philip Bobkov. He writes that Karpov took out an abbreviated version of the film from the editing room, which was then shown at the apartments of "some high-ranking officials of the Russian leadership"Once again I repeat the film was banned from showing please write this in the film Цйфыву (talk) 08:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tintin-tintine and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Family_(1943_film) the ban on this film is not documented, and the data on the ban contradict each other all the time Цйфыву (talk) 17:22, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tintin-tintine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhyd "Before the 1930s, the traditional Ukrainian word for Jew жид (zhyd) had no negative connotations, but because it coincided with the Russian slur for Jews жид (zhid), the Ukrainian word zhyd was banned by the Soviet authorities in the 1933"

this is complete nonsense, that in Russian and in the Ukrainian language until the 20s and 30s the word "Jew" was not always considered an insult, although it could be perceived as such, especially in comparison with the word Jew, but there is no ban on the word Jew was, it just began to be considered bad and nothing more Цйфыву (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bolt_(Shostakovich) There was no ban on the ballets BOLT, Bright Stream and Golden Time, they were just with the installation Цйфыву (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Цйфыву (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock me Цйфыву (talk) 14:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 14:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.