Jump to content

User talk:Knyght27

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Piotrus (talk | contribs) at 13:06, 28 May 2023 (Notification: listing of List of religious ideas in fantasy fiction at WP:Articles for deletion.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello, Knyght27, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair | Talk 15:20, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

AfD nomination of David Hatcher Childress

[edit]

I have nominated David Hatcher Childress, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hatcher Childress. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 04:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse my laziness, but given that all three of us seem to share the same opinion, I'm posting this message here, and putting pointers to it on the other two user talk pages.

  • User talk:Redvans did this edit saying without comment.
  • User talk:Knyght27 did this edit saying "News of an upcoming album does not belong in this article".
  • I was more wimpy. User talk:Pdfpdf did a number of edits - none of which were as decisive as the edits you two did.
  • (Despite the lack of edit comment), I like the solution that Redvans came up with. (It is far superior to mine.)

Knyght27:

  • Not wanting to offend, but my personal opinion is that Redvans solution is superior to your solution. (And yes, your solution is indeed superior to my "solution".)
  • What do you think?

Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you bringing this up with me. I'm sorry for undoing all your work in one fell swoop (I only just this noticed now!), although really I don't believe that the (I Need You Now) More Than Words Can Say by Alias article needs any mention of the upcoming album from the band: the topic of the article is strictly the song, and not the band's future projects (You probably noticed that an overly-excited fan has inserted a lot into the Alias-related articles in recent weeks). To be honest, I don't really understand what you're asking. Why would Redvans' solution need to be applied to the article? It doesn't seem to need it. Knyght27 (talk) 14:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Y'know, now that you mention it, I agree. (What a shame you didn't mention it before I "fixed" it!) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 14:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

haha i should have came on earlier. i just changed what i saw because, like knight said, it seemed that an alias fan had put a lot of information that wasnt quite wikipedia quality. and i was pretty lazy for not changing everything myself. but i guess everything worked itself out anyway :]Redvans (talk) 08:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Komm, süsser Tod (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Komm, süsser Tod (song). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Komm, süsser Tod (song). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Melbourne meetup this Saturday

[edit]
Melbourne Meetup

See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 04:33, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Melbourne)[reply]

Melbourne meetup

[edit]

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26

[edit]

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 05:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 09:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

[edit]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of religious ideas in fantasy fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of religious ideas in fantasy fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]