Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nestofbirdnests/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Courcelles (talk | contribs) at 16:41, 15 June 2023 (Archiving case section from w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nestofbirdnests (using spihelper.js)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Nestofbirdnests

Nestofbirdnests (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

14 April 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Nestofbirdnests reverted an edit made by C.Fred on 02:48 UTC 14 April 2023 [1]. Nestofbirdnests was indeffed for WP:NOTHERE a few seconds later. MichaelJHans was created at 03:17 UTC 14 April 2023. Their first edit was to revert the same restored edit [2], then to post a response to a report about Nestofbirdnests on C.Fred's talk page [3]. This seems far too coincidental to be anything other than a case of block evasion by the original editor. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 13:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

The only edit to an article made by Michael is to Arjuna. It's true that the one edit was exactly the same as the one made by Nest, but I don't think they are the same person. I think that before creating an account, Michael used Special:contributions/68.205.26.246, which is precisely what he says at ANI, and is also why after only one edit by the registered account, I warned him about edit-warring as the IP had made several reverts. In addition, looking at times when Nest posted to Talk pages, their style of writing is completely different from the very long-winded style of Michael. Finally, neither Michael nor the IP use any particular editing platform whereas Nest uses "Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit".--Bbb23 (talk) 13:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • If MichaelJHans is connected to any other editor at Arjuna, it is likely the IP editor who initially removed what is described as a spoiler from the intro of the article (diffs: [4] [5] [6]). I reverted the last of these three IP edits ([7]). Nestofbirdnests then went on their destruction spree, reverting a number of my edits, including this one. In my analysis of the situation, Nest's revert was targeted vandalism/wikihounding aimed at any edit I made, regardless of its nature, whereas Michael's edit was at least followed up by a relatively civil comment on my talk page asking about the content in question. I blocked Nest, and I do not see the hallmarks of Nest's edits in Michael's edits, at least not to date. I believe the two accounts are unrelated. —C.Fred (talk) 16:01, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Based on my comments and C.Fred's agreement + additional information, I'm closing this with no action. Bbb23 (talk) 16:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

18 April 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

All accounts are interested in languages, especially language isolates and languages in America, and removing claims that a language is a language isolate. Diffs: [8], [9], [10]*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 23:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

23 April 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same interest in languages, American languages, and removal of the "language isolate" label. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 04:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

02 May 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Removing the language isolate claim again, as with previous socks: [13], [14], [15]. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 14:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

09 May 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Here's another one quacking.

Again, removing the language isolate status from various articles[16][17], as with previous socks[18][19].

Also trolling again on Fdom5997's user talk page: Special:Diff/1153960876. Austronesier (talk) 11:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

24 May 2023

[edit]

Adding for the record:

, blocked. Fut.Perf. 10:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

24 May 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Housekeeping GeneralNotability (talk) 13:50, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

14 June 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Pro forma, mostly for the lock request. --Blablubbs (talk) 22:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

12 June 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Both of accounts have made same edits by creating draft article for Windows builds, and violate copy right by copy from betawiki. Winbytedemo: [20], [21] Xpbuild2504: [22], [23] Tetadřvo (talk) 00:27, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]