Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LogiNext

LogiNext

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined an A7 tag on this article, as there appear to be numerous sources that suggest an encyclopaedic article could be written. However, the article has been previously deleted via PROD and speedy, and so I think we need a proper discussion over this. So have at it. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The news links on the company's website at https://www.loginextsolutions.com/company/newsmedia might be useful references. It might be helpful to restore the history of the deleted articles (unless there were copyright concerns) to see whether anything can be salvaged from the previous versions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. I've restored the history so people can do that. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New Jersey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is the word "headquarted" now part of the English language rather than just marketing-bollocks-speak? I know that I got it taken out of published materials as the latter in a company where I worked in the 1990s, but maybe things have changed since then. The links from the company's own site pointed out by Eastmain just seem to be press releases and "30 under 30" fluff. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Changes made to article since nomination for deletion → https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LogiNext&diff=1163071219&oldid=1162350560 . --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 20:09, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The Forbes India article is actually a pretty decent source, but it's specifically about the business as a start up. It says Sanghvi worked for Deloitte... and Deloitte recognized his company? (That's a PR release). Got a review of two software - basically what we have is a lot of "this is startup to keep an eye on" type articles, which is very NOW, but not showing "ongoing media coverage" as described in WP:CORP. Denaar (talk) 22:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 13:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; see my rationale at WP:SERIESA. This kind of hair-splitting is frustrating when we know the article is clearly a promo and the company is not significant in any sense other than its existence as a normal business. I wish we could come to consensus on whether financial and business press alone can establish notability (in which case Wikipedia will be flooded with articles like this) or whether something else is needed. FalconK (talk) 19:41, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]