Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calyon Financial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Calyon Financial

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:32, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

nn company which may fail WP:corp prod contested Oo7565 (talk) 09:46, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Newedge Group which already contains this article's information (though it could benefit from 3rd party refs). AllyD (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Calyon is on the borderline of notability, but I don't see why it really needs its own article after the merger with Newedge, particularly since it's a skeleton article which simply refers to the merger. Nwlaw63 (talk) 15:43, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Calyon is a separate entity from Calyon Financial, which is the sort of confusion this article helps prevent. The article could benefit from expansion. Bchabala2 (talk) 16:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The topic is meeting WP:GNG:

Meyer, Gregory (January 9, 2006). "Calyon Financial's New Electronic Strategist". Crain's Chicago Business. Retrieved July 15, 2012. (subscription required)
"Calyon Financial/Fimat agreement seen in H1 -SocGen". Reuters. February 14, 2007. Retrieved July 15, 2012.

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep It passes GNG although not otherwise notable, IMO.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:33, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.