User talk:Marlon.sahetapy

Welcome!

Hello, Marlon.sahetapy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am CTSWyneken. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Provide an Edit summary
Take a look at Consensus of standards. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)
Create a User page

Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. --CTSWyneken 23:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)^(talk)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Foto 100 cruyff.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Foto 100 cruyff.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:1149172742.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1149172742.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:4_16g_nplayer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:4_16g_nplayer.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George Best

Hi Marlon,

Why do you keep reverting the article? It is not claimed that he was the best ever, merely one of, as Pele for one thinks? bigpad 23:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, see latest version to the article, which is in keeping with the pages for Pele, Maradona and Cryuff. There is no need to edit that part again. bigpad 11:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your tiresome revisions to the above page, as per above explanation bigpad 10:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re your message on my talk page: so do you consider Pele having him in his list of the greatest ever, and well up that list, as being unattributable? And being European Footballer of the Year? And Sir Bobby Charlton, whose interview of saw and heard, describe his impact as sensational. Forgive me if I'm less than impressed with the point about his not being as well known outside the "UK". The article quite clearly says that it was N. Ireland's lack of success that denied him the global audience to show his talents. Was he to blame for this? Views on greatness are subejctive: how can they be otherwise: but to confine Best to the "British" game is unfair. And we'll see if we can find those unattribitable quotes to Pele. I'll check and revert the article in the meantime. All the best, bigpad 09:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you leave the article as it was until discussion has taken place please. I have raised it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Think that is the best place. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 13:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not "spamming" or "vandalising" your page. I believe you are using several different accounts including this one, User:Le Professeur70 and possibly User:PanteraNegro as your editing patterns are the same. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 08:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Add User:Brasileiro1969 to that list. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 11:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And User:Dr.Sauerkraut. Do you deny these are all you? Why use so many accounts? Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 11:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stu you currently act like a pretty paranoid and frustrated guy. Pushing your POV wherever you can. Add false allegations to the list. Great stuff, buddy. Wikipedia appreciates your 'efforts'.

Again, I'm not pushing any point of view, I'm removing it from articles. And yes, Wikipedia does appreciate my efforts. Please read WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. And it is fairly clear you are editing with several different accounts. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 13:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]