Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isobell Shyrie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isobell Shyrie

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing for notability, a few lines in a non-RS used (red per source bot). Not seeing GNG met, nor NBIO. Oaktree b (talk) 20:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Magic, and Scotland. Oaktree b (talk) 20:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there appears to be some variation in spelling for her name. Found some sources for Isobel (single L) Shyrie - [1][2][3]. Also some for "Issobell Syrie" (gaelic?) [4]. Makes for a weak-ish case for WP:GNG. Maybe better to merge/redirect to Great Scottish Witch Hunt of 1661–62.-KH-1 (talk) 02:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: have added refs which show her as one of Guthrie's alleged colleagues. PamD 08:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep She comes under WP:VICTIM and given the amount of scholarly work going on at present about Scottish witchcraft, it would be premature to delete. MsJoat (talk) 19:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think the sources are reliable 1, 2, 3 Charsaddian (talk) 19:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.