Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Reason: This is one of the actors that have contradicting birth years online. According to the Associated Press(which is considered reliable) he turned 58 last fall. Which would make his birth year 1964. However various editors keep changing it to 1967 while either ignoring the cited source or even outright removing it. Kcj5062 (talk) 21:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Note: There is a discussion on the article talk page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hash it out on the article talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Allow only extended confirmed users : Persistent removal of sourced contents and addition of highly biased one sided contents, by newly created accounts (which have become autoconfirmed users), resulting to persistent edit war, between multiple people. --Haoreima (talk) 09:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More than two years of IP-hopping attempts to change eye colour from sourced "blue" to "green". Talk page thread, and IP warnings ineffective. Meters (talk) 10:49, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:37, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 10:57, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I requested protection yesterday on a WP:GS/AA article and explained the reason of IP disruption [1]. The article wasn't protected and the disruption continued, to the point of edit-warring and IP likely making an account to do the same WP:JDLI revert [2], [3], [4]. I'm asking for this article to be protected to avoid wasting community time, clearly the IP doesn't listen to any rationale and just adds their original research. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 12:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – constant, increasingly uncivil vandalism from an ip hopper who describes their claim as "factual" and sources saying the opposite as "erroneous". cogsan • (give me attention) • (see my deeds) 12:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Endorse long term semi-protection, ideally extended-confirmed protection, owing to the fact that the IP has vowed to continue edit warring once their block is over.[5][6][7] — Czello (music) 12:33, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- diffs: 1 (accusation of edit warring when all prior edits were reverted by different people), 2 (taking the discussion to the talk page, with no intention of actual discussion)
- was previously asked by czello to try to achieve consensus (here), but they do the same every time: say the claim is true with the equivalent of "source: trust me dude", place the burden of disproof on the previously sourced claim, and go back to edit warring
- the article is currently whitelocked, but i don't think it's working to stop this fiasco cogsan • (give me attention) • (see my deeds) 12:37, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism/spamming Groupthink (talk) 12:29, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- I-League (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- I-League 3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi protection: High level of IP vandalism. — Akshadév™ 💬 12:41, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Shameless user questions edits i do for few years regarding this topic. He did infobox season overlink vandalism + removed continental entry which has numerous sources (https://www.the-aiff.com/article/aiff-executive-committee-inducts-five-new-clubs-into-hero-i-league-federation-cup-restored); Federation Cup (India) (he has block history, got reported again, possible one sockpuppet new account, and article talkpage is updated. fake news and lack of local care + lack of abroad knowledge makes indian "soccer" articles easy to manipulate, but vandalism cant last to infinity).
Semi protection: persistent promotion and advertising from IPs and sockpuppets which has been going on at least 2 years Ertoe (talk) 12:41, 3 August 2023 (UTC)