Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucie Miller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Eighth Doctor#Lucie Miller. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lucie Miller[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While a very notable companion in spin-off material, I cannot find any evidence of SIGCOV. A quick search for sources yields only one or two potential results, which aren't enough to build an article off of. As it stands, the article fails SIGCOV. A redirect to either the Companion article or the list of Doctor Who Supporting Characters article seems the best option here. Pokelego999 (talk) 19:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy. Pokelego999 (talk) 19:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Television, and United Kingdom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 21:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Not enough sources exist to make an article. I have no opinion on which redirect target would be better. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While a lot of the audio companions might not rise to this, as her stories were broadcast on BB7 I believe there has been coverage, such as here, which should be incorporated.Frond Dishlock (talk) 02:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you provide more than just one source? While this one does have some commentary on the character, most of the other sources I found during my search were either trivial mentions, listicles, or didn't go in depth on her. Unless more can be provided that adequately discuss the character, I don't feel it's enough to justify the article's separate existence. Pokelego999 (talk) 12:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, here is another article from Gizmodo.Frond Dishlock (talk) 05:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Redirect not enough coverage to pass WP:SIGCOV. Can't make an encyclopedic article without it. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to get a specific redirect target from y'all.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As nominator, perhaps the Companion article? She seems to be more notable in that role than as a Supporting Character. Pokelego999 (talk) 15:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Redirect It is clear there is not enough WP:RS coverage to merit an article, but a redirect may be appropriate. Go4thProsper (talk) 15:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or smerge to Eighth Doctor#Lucie Miller. No enough non-plot content for a stand-alone article. – sgeureka ^t•c 14:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.