This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
@ThurnerRupert: I suggest moving the article back to the original title. Not only it’s undue in relations title vs. content, but also as only Loibl was mentioned so far. Also, your numbers were 275 l/48 hrs; which is 125l/24 hrs, while ours were 150 l/12 hrs - which translates to 300 l/24 hrs. What are your suggestions? A09 (talk) 08:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Dubstar44: i agree why is the title Carinthia and Slovenia floods Carinthia is in Slovenia so should stick with Slovenia floods.
Current title is undue in relation of title vs. content. As previously said, only Loibl was mentioned so far. A09 (talk) 19:33, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article is incomplete, also not covering the most recent Slovenian events. So the question is, should the title be what the content is of the article at the moment; or should the title be what the complete article should be? An Austrian section with “incomplete section template”/“update template” can easily be added. 109.38.139.34 (talk) 19:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tentative support. It might be too early to tell, as the floods are currently still affecting Croatia, but from what I've seen, Slovenia has borne the brunt of the damage. At the very least, it should be mentioned first. DaßWölf 20:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Carinthia
I suggest using "Austrian Carinthia" and "Slovenian Carinthia" in place of "Carinthia" and "Koroška [sic]", respectively, to make the article easier to read. DaßWölf 21:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with this proposal. A09 (talk) 21:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]