Talk:25th/49th Battalion, Royal Queensland Regiment

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 25th/49th Battalion, Royal Queensland Regiment article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Queensland / Military history B‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal 25th/49th Battalion, Royal Queensland Regiment is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Military history: South Pacific / World War I / World War II B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Image copyright problem with Image:RQR.GIF

The image Image:RQR.GIF is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:09, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for more information

Some improvement suggestions:

Information in this article needs to be referenced (I've added a References & Notes section, so it is all set up to go if someone has citations to add) Done
A list of commanding officers would be interesting Not done
More information on the current structure perhaps Done
Also the narrative is a bit cluttered, particularly in the introduction (perhaps the information in the introduction regarding current set up could be moved down further in the article in a separate section on 'Current Structure and Commitments' Fixed

Just a few suggestions, anyway. If you are able to help, go for it! Cheers.AustralianRupert (talk) 03:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WWI & WWII information

This article is being used to cover the WWI & WII histories of the 25th and 49th Battalions and then the Post WWII history of 25/49 RQR. I do not believe it adequately covers the WWI and WWII areas because to do so would make the article rather large and a bit cumbersome. I am of the opinion that both 25th Battalion and 49th Battalion should have separate pages from 25/49 RQR. 25/49 RQR could then broadly touch upon the two earlier battalions, whilst the separate pages could focus more specifically on those individual battalions during WWI and WWII.

I understand that the decision to incorporate everything on this article has been made previously by people with more wikipedia experience than I, so I will not change anything yet. I'd be interested to find out what other people think about this, though. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved. Having talked to other contributors, it seems that the best policy is to keep the situation as is (using this page to discuss the anticedent units' history also). I will try to expand now in order to provide adequate coverage. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, many years later - I've re-thought this approach and created separate articles that cover the topics in more detail. The articles are here: 25th Battalion (Australia) and 49th Battalion (Australia). Happy to discuss if others disagree. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:51, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I think this is the best approach. Excellent work on these articles BTW. Anotherclown (talk) 09:06, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree,mas a post war 49er, I am disturbed by the incorrect information here. The RQR badge colours are wrong and the colour patch description is also wrong. It should be taken down. 27.33.242.218 (talk) 08:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong colours.

Wrong colour Badge, it is Silver with Royal Blue inlay. The colour patch is not black over blue, it is Navy Blue over Sky Blue. We'll start there. Btapps (talk) 02:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]