User talk:Ilovejames5

This is Ilovejames5's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Ilovejames5! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:56, Friday, January 6, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

January 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Salvio giuliano

23:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ilovejames5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why do you give me an indefinite block as my first one??? Also, when did I edit disruptively??? This block is really not acceptable!Ilovejames 5🚂:) 04:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think that you understand the seriousness with which we take copyright matters. You clearly mean well, but we cannot permit you to continue to make copyright violations and have others clean up after you. There are other issues with your behavior as well, as noted in the ANI discussion. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, please see some of my other edits. Only a small amount of edits match what you said! Ilovejames 5🚂:) 04:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that you came to edit Wikipedia with a lot of enthusiasm, no doubt with high hopes of what you expected to do here. It must be very disappointing, to say the least, to have your hopes dashed in this way. I gave you some advice a while ago, in the hope that it would help you to settle in as a Wikipedia editor, and it's disappointing that it didn't work, but I will now give you some more advice, in the hope that this time it may be more helpful. Reading all the things that people have written to you, your reaponses to those messages, and the ways you have continued to edit following the messages, I'm afraid it is clear that you really haven't understood a lot of the points that people have tried to make. The best way forward for you now is to forget about editing Wikipedia for a couple of years, and if after that time you are still interested in contributing, come back and request an unblock. After that much time there's a good chance that you will be able to have a better grasp of the various issues, and I for one would be willing to give you another chance. JBW (talk) 09:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @JBW: Can you review my unblock request, (I hope you accept it)? Ilovejames 5🚂:) 10:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ilovejames5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

People have given me more than enough warnings about copyvio, but you blocked me before i could redeem myself.

Decline reason:

You just don't get it. You were given plenty of opportunities to redeem yourself, and didn't take them. Also, as was pointed out to you in the response to your last unblock request, there are other problems apart from copyright, which you haven't addressed. JBW (talk) 08:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ilovejames5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@JBW:, I have totally learned my lesson, please unblock me. After that I will make sure to follow all policies, and you will see I am clearly an editor who is trying to improve Wikipedia. Please accept my request, because I really need to be unblocked. I am not an editor who only edits disruptively. After you unblock me and a few months passes, you will see my competence to edit here. I am completely fed up with this block, and it is honestly overly annoying. Please unblock me ASAP. I now understand a lot of stuff about Wikipedia, including: * Copyright is serious, and must never ever be ignored * Every editor (including me) must follow WP:V and WP:N Ilovejames 5🚂:) 09:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We can't wait a few months for you to gain competence. Your unblock requests aren't convincing anyone. Step away. en.wikipedia isn't the place for you at this time. Perhaps in six months or a year, when you have months of significant editing on another project with zero problems, you can come back here and request an unblock. Not now, though. Yamla (talk) 11:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your reason is so rude, I’m surprised no one cares about the f*cking tone, especially “Step away”, which is just bullsh*t. Ilovejames 5🚂:) 11:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ilovejames5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am completely fed up with the rude tone of the previous decline, and I am certainly going to not edit disruptively ever again. Also I expect a respond with a more polite tone. Please unblock me, because I have many good-faith edits that this annoying block prevented. Even if you don’t immediately accept, please give me a second chance. Ilovejames 5🚂:) 11:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Absolutely not at this point. You need to walk away from the project for some time, and to be blunt grow up. Take 6-12 months, review our policies on copyright, how to behave on Wikipedia and then come back with a solid unblock request and it will be reviewed fairly. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2023

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

$Salvio giuliano$ 13:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:LNER Class D47

Hello, Ilovejames5. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LNER Class D47, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:GCR Class 13

Hello, Ilovejames5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "GCR Class 13".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 11:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:LNER Class D47

Hello, Ilovejames5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "LNER Class D47".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 11:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #78661

is open. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:24, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Salvio giuliano: I'd like to restore TPA to be able to discuss more easily with appellant. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deepfriedokra, no objection at all from me. —

Salvio giuliano

17:46, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TPA restored Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:51, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My comment is as follows:I will check my edits thoroughly, and rewrite any sentences that are too similar to the source. I will also use any available sources, rather than just one. Ilovejames 5🚂:) 02:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let's put the copyvio problem on hold for a moment. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please critique this edit. What is wrong with it? What would you do different? Thanks-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I should not have acted so rude towards him Ilovejames 5🚂:) 15:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. What should you have done instead? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I should have politely explained why I did not use the correct summary without using inappropriate language and personal attacks at him. Ilovejames 5🚂:) 07:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Closed ticket in favor of discussing here.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]