User talk:Woufeq

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Nil Einne (talk) 12:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 22:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Woufeq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An Administrator accused me as a sockpuppet of Buevell. I even dont know well about this user. I just restored removed edits which seemed legit to me. I didn't look over who were the blocked users. This is totally a shocking to me. I seek unblock definitely. I didn't vandalize Wikipedia, I respected Wikipedia's policy while editing and gave references whatever I found for the edit. Woufeq (talk) 22:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think this is a coincidence. 331dot (talk) 07:19, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Woufeq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just because some edits are similar with a previously blocked user, now I am the sockpuppet of that user? I would like to request to see my edit history. I have restored many removed edits of other users too. I see injustice with me. Its my only account and I am not responsible for other's contributions here. I want to be unblocked for obvious reason. I will help Wikipedia with my best and will improve myself Woufeq (talk) 21:41, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser data is consistent with previously blocked sockpuppet accounts. However, the data is too stale to make a definitive finding. Nevertheless, this significantly strengthens the justification for the block. Yamla (talk) 20:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

more You are free to access your own edit history; it's under "contributions" at the top of the screen(depending on your preferred skin/appearance, it may be in a drop down menu). Yes, editing the same topics as a blocked user is generally considered sockpuppetry, or more specifically meat puppetry. If you can provide a plausible explanation for doing so, please do. 331dot (talk) 20:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:I know about Middle Eastern ruling family and I also know about South Asian countries' politicians. I am focused on their daily affairs and personal life. Additionally, I know about Islam and Medieval Arab era. I usually add missing informations which aren't included or I restore infos or references of these area which seems essential to me. Moreover, I really didn't care what was added by that blocked user. I added someone's spouse, which wasn’t in the existing page, anyone would do that who knows them. Now the administrator accusing that As I am a sockpuppet, I added the same info which I am not. A person's spouse is a certain person, its not that case which changes day by day. Now What's the wrong with my edit? I want to say another time that there is no relation between me and that blocked user. I seek unblock now.Woufeq (talk) 20:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:I know about Middle Eastern ruling family and I also know about South Asian countries' politicians. I am focused on their daily affairs and personal life. Additionally, I know about Islam and Medieval Arab era. I usually add missing informations which aren't included or I restore infos or references of these area which seems essential to me. Moreover, I really didn't care what was added by that blocked user. I added someone's spouse, which wasn’t in the existing page, anyone would do that who knows them. Now the administrator accusing that As I am a sockpuppet, I added the same info which I am not. A person's spouse is a certain person, its not that case which changes day by day. Now What's the wrong with my edit? I want to say another time that there is no relation between me and that blocked user. I seek unblock now and I am not a sockpuppet of that account.Woufeq (talk) 20:26, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]