Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Radio Santa Cruz
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Jonesey95 (talk | contribs) at 16:06, 16 October 2023 (Fix Linter errors.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sourcing can be fixed. Overall consensus is to keep. NJA (t/c) 10:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Free Radio Santa Cruz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
another non-notable pirate radio station, mostly unsourced Rapido (talk) 11:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 18:03, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Has references, just need inline. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 00:38, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as subject appears to meet verifiability and notability thresholds with sustained coverage from multiple reliable third-party sources. - Dravecky (talk) 06:36, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "Multiple reliabl"? Maybe 1 third party source. Of the 3 sources, one is the website of a show aired on the station and another is nothing more than a student newspaper. The third source is questionable too. All 3 sources are only about the FCC raid that shut down the station. So I say Delete. TJ Spyke 16:25, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Student newspapers are perfectly valid and acceptable sources, not "nothing more than". Bearcat (talk) 22:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Spyke. Terrible sourcing. The most notable thing it ever did was get shut down, apparently. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 01:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The station is as notable as any other radio station in the area. True, the article needs better sources, but it deserves to be here. --mcpusc (talk) 15:48, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.