Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broze, Chitral

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Broze, Chitral

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If this is a town, it should meet WP:NPLACE. However, I could not find sources to prove it, and the sources originally added did not mention it. The creator has been banned. Boleyn (talk) 12:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Pakistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete without prejudice to recreation with sources It's bad enough that we have to dig through all the geostubs to verify that they aren't misrepresenting their database sources (because so many are bogus), but nothing is lost by deleting those that are unsourced. It is colossal waste of time to have multiple people chasing around for sources, when it could be the one person making a sourced article, were that possible. Mangoe (talk) 13:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It exists [1], but that is hardly notable. Unsourced stub. I'd just TNT and move on. Oaktree b (talk) 20:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Added 4 new references to the above unreferenced article including the one (Dawn newspaper) supplied by Oaktree b above. The other 3 archived references are by the Government of Pakistan and the Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. In my view, it meets WP:NPLACE now...Ngrewal1 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Excellent work, Ngrewal1, it does look like it meets NPLACE now. Boleyn (talk) 07:37, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Verified as a legally, recognised populated place under WP:GEOLAND gives Broze a presumption of notability. We should be trying our best to expand the article rather than delete. Rupples (talk) 05:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep lacked electricity as of 2018; study of urbanisation at union council level, "the Kalasha's major Joshi festival was held in Broze, Chitral during the era when Chitral was under Kalasha dominion.". Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 08:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.