Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharlene San Pedro
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Jonesey95 (talk | contribs) at 04:25, 16 November 2023 (Fix Linter errors.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 21:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sharlene San Pedro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Child actor, only media coverage is fairly trivial. Chick Bowen 17:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but edit The extent of the subject's filmography should not be ignored by the nominator. We should, however, add sources. Starczamora (talk) 08:28, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sharlene San Pedro is an active actress. Being a child actress, I believe is not a strong reason for deletion. She has current TV projects.--JL 09 q?c 18:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 03:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - most of her roles are supporting roles or one-shot appearances, but she appears to have a decent acting career going. - Richard Cavell (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.