User talk:Talsh1991

Conflict of interest disclosures

Hello, Talsh1991. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Wendypeter1981 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wendypeter1981. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 07:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Talsh1991 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not have multiple accounts and I am brand new to editing for Wikipedia. I understand now the rules about conflicts of interest and will not partake in these actions but I am not a “sock puppet” with other account, thanks . Talsh1991 (talk) 01:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A mere denial is insufficient in sock puppetry cases. If you are not a sock puppet, you will need to address the information in the SPI(Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wendypeter1981/Archive). It's possible that this is meat puppetry, which is treated the same. 331dot (talk) 10:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

At the time, I was unaware that it wasn’t permitted to edit a friend’s page. I should have reviewed the terms more closely before proceeding; it was not my intention to violate any rules my friend was in distress due to changes happening on her page and I offered to revert them unaware that it was against the rules. I am now aware of these rules and will not continue this behaviour.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Talsh1991 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

At the time, I was unaware that it wasn’t permitted to edit a friend’s page. I should have reviewed the terms more closely before proceeding; it was not my intention to violate any rules my friend was in distress due to changes happening on her page and I offered to revert them unaware that it was against the rules. I am now aware of these rules and will not continue this behaviour. Talsh1991 (talk) 10:33 am, 3 December 2023, Sunday (1 month, 8 days ago) (UTC−5)

Accept reason:

Appellant agrees to avoid their conflict of interest and is asked to read and heed-- WP:UPE and WP:PAID. Welcome back. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please describe what constructive edits unrelated to your friend you would make. Thanks-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My strengths are proofreading, and copywriting/editing. I currently work as a copywriter and fact-checker for a technology company. I am interested in theatre, film, television, and politics. To start, I do not intend to create new pages or make large changes to existing pages. I intend to contribute positively and with special adherence to the rules outlined by Wikipedia. Talsh1991 (talk) 07:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: OK to unblock? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:57, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: I would not object, especially if Talsh1991 lives up to the promise of avoiding conflicts of interest and reviews WP:UPE / WP:PAID. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]