Talk:Interplanetary medium

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Solar System Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as High-importance).

Aha! broken link here too

the link under the Heliospheric-current-sheet image has either expired or been tampered with, just as in the Sun article. There, I replaced it with what seemed to be the next best thing, this neighbour gif image, but it might not be so best at all. This field not my strong suit, so I leave it to those of you for whom it is ;) —MURGH ^disc. 01:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Composition and physical characteristics

"The interplanetary medium includes interplanetary dust, cosmic rays and hot plasma from the solar wind. The temperature of the interplanetary medium is approximately 100,000 K, and its density is very low at about 5 particles per cubic centimeter in the vicinity of the Earth; ... ." But what is the estimated mean density in, maybe, grams per cubic kilometre? 82.163.24.100 (talk) 19:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where did the value of 100,000 K come from? If true, this figure is confusing because no explanation is given to reconcile it with the 3 K temperature of outer space. Aniboy2000 (talk) 19:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- I found the 100,000 K value on a couple of websites, but I get the impression that they copied the wikipedia article. The actual values from a slightly more respectable site can be found here: http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com/topics/milkyway/InterstellarMedium.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.64.118 (talk) 22:40, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't confuse Interplanetary medium and Interstellar medium. --Art Carlson (talk) 08:12, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clarifications needed

We have this page, Interplanetary dust cloud and Cosmic dust. These pages do not clearly explain the difference between these three concepts. Could someone please clarify this, maybe put something in the article? Should some of these pages be merged? D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:54, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not all merged. Cosmic dust deals with dust as a generic topic. The interplanetary medium is not solely dust. As cosmic dust deals with dust in regions beyond the Solar System/interplanetary space, merging that away wouldn't be appropriate.

Interplanetary space, Heliosphere, and Interplanetary medium deal with the same region... but cover differing aspects of it. Not forgetting Zodiacal light and Gegenschein, also concerning the interplanetary dust cloud 76.65.129.5 (talk) 05:21, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The interplanetary medium consists of interplanetary plasma and interplanetary dust. Cosmic dust is a catch-all term for both interplanetary dust and interstellar dust; there are key differences between the two. Modest Genius ^talk 14:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interplanetary medium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901124602/http://quake.stanford.edu/~wso/gifs/HCS.html to http://quake.stanford.edu/~wso/gifs/HCS.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]