This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 20:04, 14 January 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Ancient Egypt}}, {{WikiProject Glass}}, {{WikiProject Visual arts}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 20:04, 14 January 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Ancient Egypt}}, {{WikiProject Glass}}, {{WikiProject Visual arts}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
No, Faience is not "more correctly defined as Egyptian faience." This article needs an opening statement of what Egyptian faience actually is, and an explanation of how the term faience has been extended to cover it. Without such a head, the article is running about like a chicken at the poultry shop. The former statement was
"Egyptian faience is an extension of the term faience. Faience describes Islamic and European tin-glazed earthenware, and has been extended to describe the ceramic faience of pre-Dynastic (cf. the Badarian and Naqada periods) and Pharaonic Egypt, Crete and sites in the Indus Valley civilization."
Is Egyptian faience still made today? One can easily buy any quantity of lustrous glazed blue beads, in many shapes including scarabs, from Egyptian handcraft dealers. Are these Egyptian faience, or not?
If they are, surely it would be possible for researchers to examine the modern methods of manufacture and compare them to all their many hypotheses. Doing so might shed some light on the ancient artefacts and materials.
If not, it would be useful information for anybody trying to learn more about the antique material to know exactly:
_01.svg){kind=small}
