Talk:2004 Oregon Ballot Measure 36
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Map caption
[edit]I don't think it is entirely clear which shade of green is intended to be considered "bold." Distinguishing between light and dark green, I think would avoid any confusion. Or maybe my astygmatism is just kicking in. -- "J-M" (Jgilhousen) 04:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm fairly certain that the dark green counties are the ones that voted for the measure by a 2/3 margin and are thus labeled "bold green." I concur with your assessment, though; I only knew which shade was considered to be "bold" because of a general familiarity with Oregon political demographics. The phrases "light green" and "dark green" would be more understandable. —NathanDahlin 21:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- I went ahead and changed the caption to "bright green" and "dark green" per this discussion. —NathanDahlin 03:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Efforts to repeal
[edit]Does anyone remember the movement to revoke this measure, which was put on hold when Justice McShane made his decision? Is this part of the constitution dead wood only as long as McShane's -- as well as today's Supreme Court decision -- is observed? -- llywrch (talk) 19:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Oregon Ballot Measure 36 (2004). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theoutlookonline.com/article/2410
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)