Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eid-ul-Milad-un-Nabi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Goldsztajn (talk | contribs) at 10:49, 19 January 2024 (→‎Eid-ul-Milad-un-Nabi: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. While there's a clear consensus this is a notable topic in and of itself, there's no present consensus on a move; this can, however, be continued at the article's talk page. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn (talk) 10:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eid-ul-Milad-un-Nabi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant content fork of Mawlid. The term Eid-ul-Milad-un-Nabi is just a subcontinetal term for Mawlid, refers to the same thing. Kermanshehi (talk) 14:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC) Sockstrike ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 00:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mate, what is your argument? I never advocated WP:ILIKEIT or WP:IDONTLIKEIT? Nor have I said anything against celebrating the festival of Mawlid al-Nabi/Eid Milad-un-Nabi. The thing is that this festival, Milad-un-Nabi is the same as Mawlid al-Nabi. Kermanshehi (talk) 22:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Sockstrike ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 00:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed it's the same festival, but neither you nor I adopted the non-Arabic DIFFERENT LOCALIZED NAME in the Indian subcontinent for it which has managed to survive over many many generations. I am convinced that there are ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCES in local languages and the local practices that people of the Indian subcontinent themselves still CHOOSE to continue using a different localized name. I personally don't have any problems understanding and accepting their choice, even though I fully agree with you that the intent and purpose of this festival is the same. Frankly, I am afraid if we Redirect or Merge the two articles, it will surely pop up again under the non-Arabic name. This is my reason to vote KEEP...Ngrewal1 (talk) 01:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and rename - The title of this article 'Eid-ul-Milad-un-Nabi' is indeed one of the Arabic names for mawlid (another is Mīlād al-Nabī). It's as if there would be an article on Christmas in Ireland called Dies Natalis Christi (Latin for 'Christmas'). We don't have that article, but we surely do have Christmas in Ireland (as we have Christmas in Italy, etc. etc.). It seems beyond doubt that there should be enough reliable sources on Mawlid in South Asia to write an article on it? See for example the excellent Brill source Malik 2023: it's open access and pretty comprehensive, so should make an excellent starting point for writing an article. Parvez 2014 and perhaps Weinrich 2022 should also be helpful in writing the article.
    Such an article could for example explain (as Ngrewal wrote above) in detail how some currents of Islam in South Asia such as the Barelvi movement still celebrate the festival, while others such as the Deobandi movement came to reject it in the late 19th century. No doubt specific rituals and celebrations also differ from other parts of the Islamic world. There is very likely something of encyclopedic value here, it just still needs to be written.
    Now according to WP:PAGEDECIDE, an article may be a stub even though many sources exist, but simply have not been included yet. Such a short page is better expanded than merged into a larger page. So move to Mawlid in South Asia and let it be expanded. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 01:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Apaugasma Just a small advice, it can be expanded in this name also, it’ll be more good. There are many debated on this subject between the Barelvis, Deobandis, Ahle Hadiths and Ahle Qurans. There may be a section for this. — Quadrimobile(T · C 06:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I am also in favor of expanding this existing article and prefer to leave the name alone as it already has been IN USE by the people for over a century...Ngrewal1 (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Per the views and reasons of Ngrewal1, it can be expanded but not Renamed or Redirected. The same name is being used for centuries in the South Asia. — Quadrimobile(T · C 18:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.