Talk:Bolt thrust

It is requested that a diagram or diagrams of a weapon be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

This page is so technically incorrect it is almost silly. But very impressive attempt to make cobbled formulas and pirated images appear as scientific work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.190.162 (talk) 14:54, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AFD. 108.226.42.84 (talk) 00:58, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide technical references to prove your point before you start to question the formulas and texts on the websites of US barrel builder Dan Lilja and German gun and ammunition manufacturer Lutz Möller. Mr. Möller is even more cautious in one of his texts than the formula used in the article since he uses the largest chamber diameter. Chambers are of course slightly larger than the cartridge case heads that go in them. Catastrophic failures caused by faulty design assumptions can cost German arms and ammunition manufacturers their production licenses and put them out of business, so they tend to be cautious. Remind the deflagration induced pressure equalizes in the volume it occupies. There are no pockets of significantly differing pressure in a party balloon or cartridge case.--Francis Flinch (talk) 08:17, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bolt thrust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vector?

Why is this considered to be a vector? If the direction is implicit in the definition (ie "rearward thrust"), doesn't that make it a scalar? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]