Talk:Battle of Caishi

Battle of Caishi is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 18, 2014.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 29, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
March 28, 2014	Featured article candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 17, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Song fleet, armed with bombs launched by trebuchets, defeated the Jin navy in the Battle of Caishi* on the Yangtze River during the Jin–Song wars?*
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 26, 2015, November 26, 2016, November 27, 2018, and November 27, 2020.
Current status: Featured article

Military history: Asian / Chinese / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

China: History Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Mid-importance).

Quality

Too bad this is a featured article. The writing is fairly confusing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.225.33.104 (talk) 00:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I feel it is not currently in FA shape - but it has the potential to be strengthened into one without that much work - mostly, the sources need to be more scholarly.50.111.2.50 (talk) 21:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]