Talk:Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 29, 2011.

Mexico Mid‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Rankings

I am sure we can argue eternally on which is the best, the second best university in the country, which is the reason I would be in favour of a neutral statement such as “It is one of the nation’s preeminent institutions of higher learning, and one of the top business schools in Mexico, ranked as one of the best business and economics school in Latin America”, instead of actually stating it is only behind UNAM. Nobody in its right mind would contest the first statement, whereas the actual ranking can be openly disputed.

Why?, well rankings tend to be controversial because depending of measurement parameters used the results are usually incompatible when comparing the different sources. In addition, year to year comparisons form the same source tend to be unstable. Even if univesity rankings are widely used, they are not considered to reflect objectively the variable that is being analyzed.

Given, that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia I believe that information on rankings is valuable and should be included, not to support a statement, but as general information. My personal opinion would be to follow the example of Wikipedia articles on several US universities (eg. Stanford and Harvard) and find a neutral way to include the ranking issue inside the article body, for example under the “Today” subtitle.

If there are no good reasons one against this move I will proceed to make it in the following days (as soon as I find the time to do it).--LS1010 14:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the changes done by an anonymous user (who also deleted a message I left for User:Hapmt, who has done most of the latest editing in this article). The ITAM is one of the finest schools in Mexico, but there is no evidence to support a claim such as "[It is] the second highest ranked internationally (only behind the National Autonomous University of Mexico)". As a matter of fact, the ITAM does not lead or follows the UNAM in a single international or national ranking (see, for instance, es:Clasificación académica de universidades de México). In addition, the cited survey from Reforma does not support the second claim, the one about being "the best business and economics school in Mexico". Reforma's methodology is quite clear:

La edición de Las Mejores Universidades 2007 evalúa en este año 15 programas a nivel licenciatura que se imparten en 63 instituciones de educación superior, las cuales abarcan un total de 95 campus en la zona metropolitana de la Ciudad de México.

In short, its scope is clearly limited to bachelor's degree programs in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area. --José Gnudista 05:51, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this article is byased

ok, so i am reading the article about this school and is clear to me that it was written as a form of propaganda. it is not objective.

So, change it. Anybody can, this is a wiki. --Vizcarra 00:00, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Change of name

Look at Category:Universities and colleges in Mexico all colleges are listed by name, not by initials (with ITESM as an exception). --Vizcarra 00:00, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo ITAM.gif

Image:Logo ITAM.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]