Talk:Cloze test

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Education Mid‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Merge with cloze

Merge. Didn't know cloze already existed, just followed the lead from WP:RA. Hope some of what I wrote is preserved. Roehl Sybing 02:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discard "Cloze". "Cloze test" has a much better description. 213.112.16.31 22:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. "Cloze test" is obviously a much better article, although there are a couple of pieces of information in "Cloze" that should be rescued (namely the etymology and the reference to the inventor). The example given in "Cloze" is very poor. However, see also the comments in Talk:Cloze.AdeMiami 09:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Example

" The words "milk and eggs" is important for deciding which noun to put in the blank; "supermarket" is most likely the best answer. Depending on the student, however, the first blank could either be "store" or "supermarket," while "umbrella" in the second blank may arguably be the only word that would fit, given the phrase "getting wet" later on in the sentence."

1) I don't think "supermarket" is "most likely the best answer", and I don't think presenting the only possible answers as store/supermarket is helpful. I think something along the lines of "The words "milk and eggs" is important for deciding which noun to put in the blank; correct answers might include "store", "supermarket", and "dairy"." might be better...?

2) In my opinion, "umbrella" isn't "arguably the only word that would fit". Other words e.g. hat, coat, macintosh would all fit fine.

3) Compound word answers could, on the face of it, be valid in this example. E.g. "hat and coat" would fit for the second blank, "dairy and egg stalls at the market" for the first.

Only small points but I feel the example could be better clarified. I've been trying to think of a better example that could only be one word but am having trouble coming up with anything. I think maybe more of a factual question might work better but every thing I think of could have multiple answers!

Would it be relevant to include tests in which part of the word is supplied? E.g. "The sun was shining_______ brightly".

Crana 19:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Dairy"? Why not "grocery"? That indeed had been my first thought; but I'm not a native speaker of English. Someone really should highlight that there are many many more (correct) possibilites, apart from those given. Zero Thrust (talk) 21:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gestalt theory [1].

At the target reference there is nothing about Cloze tests. Assuming this is correct information, there should be something on Cloze tests in Gestalt theory [1]. I am not qualified to do this...perhaps ssomeone can take this up.

Paul Trundley, Sydney —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.136.86.11 (talk) 06:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fill in the blank

Is there some reason the widely used name "fill-in-the-blank test" isn't mentioned in the article? —JerryFriedman (Talk) 22:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One distinction between fill-in-the-blank tests and cloze tests is that fill-in-the-blank requires the pupil to fill in the selected operative word or phrase. Fill-in-the-blank tests assess cold recall of what was taught. Teachers differ on whether a synonym is allowed; some are very dogmatic about exact recall.

A cloze test may consist of a paragraph from which every fifth word is mechanically deleted and replaced with a line of uniform length on which the pupil must write the exact word deleted (however trivial). Scores on such a cloze test are said to correlate to scores on a multiple-choice test over the same subject matter. This is attributed to RANKIN, E.F., AND CULHANE, J.W., Comparable cloze and multiple choice comprehension test scores. Journal of Reading, 1969, 13, 193-198. This result is not the major conclusion of the article nor evident from the abstract; will someone with library on-line privilege please check the full text to see whether this is buried in the details?

If the correlation is valid, then a cloze test might be used not just to assess reading comprehension but to assess subject mastery (using text not previously available to the pupils). Since subject mastery is expected to correlate to other competencies such as reading comprehension, a correction that subtracts general reading comprehension from the subject matter cloze test result would be appropriate. All this is part of a larger issue: how can understanding of subject matter, understanding that implies ability to practice the subject, be separated from scholastic aptitude (including reading comprehension)? ˜˜˜˜

Jwjwjjwj Abdullah655 (talk) 08:41, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reference format

The reference given for Citation 3 is not recognized by scholar.google.com. Removing the parenthetical description corrects this. The source suggests Sachs, J, Tung, P, and Lam, RYH, How to construct a Cloze test: Lessons from testing measurement theory models, Perspectives, 1997, v. 9, p. 145-160.˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhy67ygv (talk • contribs) 06:56, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cloze test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101102232601/http://www.edict.com.hk/vlc/cloze/cloze.htm to http://www.englishlearner.com/tests/teach.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cloze test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101102232601/http://www.edict.com.hk/vlc/cloze/cloze.htm to http://www.learnclick.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Expand

This sentence:

‘The methodology is the subject of an extensive academic literature;[2] nonetheless, teachers commonly devise ad hoc tests.’

… requires a gloss. The word ‘nonetheless’ implies that teachers have ignored the research, or are ignorant of it, or are somehow doing things wrong. --2001:44B8:3102:BB00:18D4:5826:88CD:EE29 (talk) 03:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]