Jump to content

Talk:Coke Studio (Indian TV program)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 19:07, 30 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Issues

[edit]

This article has multiple issues, please help in improving it, thanks.--AssassiN's Creed (talk) 15:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Melodies of Kashmir

[edit]

I am waheed jeelani from Kashmir presently in Mumbai...My submission is being a known singer composer of the JK state let us also represent and contribute in Coke studio. It will be a unique and wonderful fusion. Kindly approve my request... Waheed Jeelani

Cintact No. 09419056700

email. waheed_jeelani@yahoo.com Waheedjeelani (talk) 06:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coke studio Pakistan?

[edit]

Why is there no mention of Coke studio Pakistan, the success of which led Coca-Cola to launch it in India also? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.221.251.230 (talk) 07:43, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 January 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per consensus (non-admin closure)  samee  converse  19:19, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]



– These television music programme articles need to be moved to correct disambiguation under WP:NCTV. --IJBall (contribstalk) 16:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Netoholic: I've made all three consistent, in this case – originally I had the Middle East one as "program", but I decided to just use "Commonwealth English" for all three, for WP:CONSISTENCY. My guess is that articles on the Middle East are a mix of "Commonwealth" and "American" spellings, but I have not looked. I'm not married to "programme" for the third of these, but the first two should almost certainly use the Commonwealth spelling, "programme". --IJBall (contribstalk) 16:48, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@IJBall: - I think there is no need to "guess". We know at least one major Commonwealth country (Australia) goes with "program" primarily, so to try and lump them together is already a flawed conclusion. Evidence for either spelling should be brought into the discussion from 1) sources used in the articles, 2) existing articles similarly disambiguated, 3) external sources which show a prevalence in the country in question, and perhaps 4) input from Pakastani wikiprojects/editors. -- Netoholic @ 01:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have a feeling that the middle east doesn't use the UK spelling, but I could be wrong. Anyways, support nom's proposal per WP:NCTV and if someone can shed more light on the ME version, I'm not against correcting my vote for it late. Current proposal is still much better even if the regional usage is off. --Gonnym (talk) 19:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Portions of the Middle East were under British mandates in the 20th Century, so some of their spelling may still endure... [shrug] --IJBall (contribstalk) 19:41, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
True, but none of them were ever commonwealth countries, nor is English a first language in those places (which makes the issue of program vs programme pretty mute here). --Gonnym (talk) 19:48, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just to be clear, I'm not stuck on "programme" for the last one – I mostly did that for WP:CONSISTENCY with the other two. But in the case of the Middle East, I suspect both spellings of the word are probably valid. --IJBall (contribstalk) 19:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.