Talk:Christopher Cradock

Christopher Cradock has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 30, 2019	Good article nominee	Listed

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Christopher Cradock article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Maritime / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Name

The correct spelling is Cradock, as per (eg.) the 1911 Britannica Bastie 21:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

I believe more should be added to this article, as right now, sufficient credit is not given to Cradock for requesting the Defense and that here, he is displayed almost as being willing to enter the battle ("decided to engage" vs. "reluctantly engaged"). --138.88.133.164 (talk) 14:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]