Talk:Arthur Cram

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 January 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football: Scotland Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Scottish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Alternative to deletion[edit]

@BlameRuiner: How about merging this with the History of Dundee United F.C., which is tagged as being slanted towards recent events? Once merged, the info about Cram could be trimmed, but there is currently no mention at all of the WWII period in the history article. This info currently has no sources, but sources can be added (eg from digitised newspapers and this book [1]. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have anything against this. Feel free to merge, or you can go through WP:AFM to generate more responses from the community. --BlameRuiner (talk) 12:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The key problem with the proposal is there is almost no referenced material to merge, and moving the contents would create undue weight on that page. I suggest leaving it where it is and attempting to improve; if only we could work out where the original text had come from ... I note that it was added by an editor no longer active. Klbrain (talk) 17:52, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]