Talk:Chris Kilham
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Large sections of well-cited neutral information were deleted
[edit]User Anetode deleted large sections of information. This information was well-cited and neutral. Biography represents expert “Notable” within Wiki guidelines. I request that these user changes be reverted.
Large sections of well-cited neutral information were deleted
[edit]User Anetode deleted large sections of information. This information was well-cited and neutral. Biography represents expert “Notable” within Wiki guidelines. I request that these user changes be reverted. JK Greenberg (talk) 20:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- This information did not adhere to a neutral point of view as it was of an advertorial nature. It appears to have been added by someone with a clear conflict of interest and it should be re-written. More to the point, a lot of the information presented had more to do with Kilham's research findings than biographical information. While a summary of his research is certainly appropriate to the article, it should be incorporated in a summary style different from the kind I removed from the article. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:41, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Issues
[edit]While working on fixing reference warnings, I noticed that this article seems somewhat promotional. There also is a number of questionable claims, some possibly pseudoscience, but without any critical review, or information about those not being necessarily supported by modern medicine. There also may be too many links, and not enough reliable secondary source references. PaleoNeonate (talk) 18:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chris Kilham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320001722/http://somerville.patch.com/listings/sommerville-community-baptist-church to http://somerville.patch.com/listings/sommerville-community-baptist-church
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 5 August 2017 (UTC)