Jump to content

Talk:New Jersey Route 50

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 20:44, 2 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Good articleNew Jersey Route 50 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 18, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 50/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
  1. Prose needs help.
    1. The Pre-1927 Route 14 (New Jersey) link is malformed - try New Jersey Route 14 (pre-1927)?
    2. Use abbreviations. For example, U.S. Route 50 (US 50) the first time, US 50 every subsequent time.
      1. "NJ xx" violates WP:SRNC. For that you need to use "Route xx."
    3. The paragraphs in 1.2 are a bit long.
    4. How many times do you need to use "Here," in a paragraph?
      1. Cut down on "A short distance later," and *any* phrase that you keep repeating.
    5. Residential, woodland, farmland...
      1. You need to remove more.
        1. Still need to remove more. It's showing up several times in the same paragraph.
        2. "Past this interchange, Route 50 widens to a four-lane divided highway and coming to a partial interchange with the Atlantic City Expressway that has access to and from the westbound direction of the Atlantic City Expressway." - comes
          1. Again with "It continues to Tuckahoe and come to CR 669. "
    6. Hist - mid-1970s (add hyphen)
  2. Sourcing:
    1. Standardize dates in citations.
    2. phillyroads.com is not a RS.
  3. Broad, but contains unnecessary detail.
  4. Neutral.
  5. Stable.
  6. WP:ALT. Otherwise good.

On hold This article needs serious work. Please, before you nominate any more articles to GAN, fix them up so that they are not full of indiscriminate details. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:08, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above suggestions. Dough4872 (talk) 21:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Made notes above; everything else is good. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:45, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Dough4872 (talk) 00:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have cut down on several repeated words such as "where" and forms of "intersect". I have also removed details about the surroundings to the point where I feel further reductions would make the physical description too undescriptive. Dough4872 (talk) 17:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Should be good. Noticed that you introduced a grammar error in the latest round of fixes. --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed the grammar error. Dough4872 (talk) 15:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Passing article. Please go through your other articles and fix them. --Rschen7754 (T C) 21:38, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 50. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]