Fossil fuel
fuck u hydrocarbons, primarily coal, fuel oil or natural gas, formed from the remains of dead plants and animals.[1]
The theory that hydrocarbons were formed from these remains was first introduced by Mikhail Lomonosov in 1757.
In common parlance, the term "fossil fuel" also includes hydrocarbon-containing natural resources that are not derived from animal or plant sources. These are, however, properly known as mineral fuels.
Fossil fuels have made large-scale industrial development possible and have largely supplanted water-driven mills, as well as the combustion of wood or peat for heat.
"Fossil fuel" is a term for buried combustible geologic deposits of organic materials, formed from decayed plants and animals that have been converted to crude oil, coal, natural gas, or heavy oils by exposure to heat and pressure in the earth's crust over hundreds of millions of years.[2]
When generating electricity, energy from the combustion of fossil fuels is often used to power a turbine. Older generators often used steam generated by the burning of the fuel to turn the turbine, but in newer power plants the gases produced by burning of the fuel turn a gas turbine directly.
With global modernization in the 20th and 21st centuries, the thirst for energy from fossil fuels, especially gasoline derived from oil, is one of the causes of major regional and global conflicts. A global movement toward the generation of renewable energy is therefore underway to help meet the increased global energy needs.
The burning of fossil fuels by humans is the largest source of emissions of carbon dioxide, which is one of the greenhouse gases that allows radiative forcing and contributes to global warming. The atmospheric concentration of CO2, a greenhouse gas, is increasing, raising concerns that solar heat will be trapped and the average surface temperature of the Earth will rise in response. A small portion of hydrocarbon-based fuels are biofuels derived from atmospheric carbon dioxide, and thus do not increase the net amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Limits and alternatives
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/56/Global_Carbon_Emission_by_Type.png/250px-Global_Carbon_Emission_by_Type.png)
The principle of supply and demand suggests that as hydrocarbon supplies diminish, prices will rise. Therefore higher prices will lead to increased alternative, renewable energy supplies as previously uneconomic sources become sufficiently economical to exploit. Artificial gasolines and other renewable energy sources currently require more expensive production and processing technologies than conventional petroleum reserves, but may become economically viable in the near future. See Future energy development. Different alternative sources of energy include alcohols, hydrogen, nuclear, hydroelectric, solar, wind, and geothermal.
Levels and flows
Levels of primary energy sources are the reserves in the ground. Flows are production. The most important part of primary energy sources are the carbon based fossil energy sources. Oil, coal, and gas stood for 79.6% of primary energy production during 2002 (in million tonnes of oil equivalent (mtoe)) (34.9+23.5+21.2).
Levels (reserves) (EIA oil, gas, coal estimates, EIA oil, gas estimates)
- Oil: 1,050,691 to 1,277,702 million barrels (167 to 203 km³) 2003-2005
- Gas: 6,040,208 - 6,805,830 billion cubic feet (171,040 to 192,720 km³) 6,805.830*0.182= 1,239 BBOE 2003-2005
- Coal: 1,081,279 million short tons (1,081,279*0.907186*4.879= 4,786 BBOE) (2004)
Flows (daily production) during 2002 (7.9 is a ratio to convert tonnes of oil equivalent to barrels of oil equivalent)
- Oil: (10,230*0.349)*7.9/365= 77 MBD
- Gas: (10,230*0.212)*7.9/365= 47 MBOED
- Coal: (10,230*0.235)*7.9/365= 52 MBOED
Years of production left in the ground with the most optimistic reserve estimates (Oil & Gas Journal, World Oil)
- Oil: 1,277,702/77/365= 32 years
- Gas: 1,239,000/47/365= 72 years
- Coal: 4,786,000/52/365= 252 years
Note that this calculation assumes that the product could be produced at a constant level for that number of years and that all of the reserves could be recovered. In reality, consumption of all three resources has been increasing. While this suggests that the resource will be used up more quickly, in reality, the production curve is much more akin to a bell curve. At some point in time, the production of each resource within an area, country, or globally will reach a maximum value, after which, the production will decline until it reaches a point where is no longer economically feasible or physically possible to produce. See Hubbert peak theory for detail on this decline curve with regard to petroleum.
The above discussion emphasizes worldwide energy balance. It is also valuable to understand the ratio of reserves to annual consumption (R/C) by region or country. For example, energy policy of the United Kingdom recognizes that Europe's R/C value is 3.0, very low by world standards, and exposes that region to energy vulnerability, since the United Kingdom, by instance, relies on fossil fuels as its best source. It is still very controversial what fuel will be the "fuel of the future".
Environmental effects
In the United States, more than 90% of greenhouse gas emissions come from the combustion of fossil fuels.[3] See global warming. In addition other air pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, VOCs, and heavy metals are produced.
Combustion of fossil fuels generates sulfuric, carbonic, and nitric acids, which fall to Earth as acid rain, impacting both natural areas and the built environment. Monuments and sculptures made from Marble are particularly vulnerable, as the acids dissolve calcium carbonate.
Fossil fuels also contain radioactive materials, mainly uranium and thorium, that are released into the atmosphere. In 2000, about 12,000 metric tons of thorium and 5,000 metric tons of uranium were released worldwide from burning coal.[4] It is estimated that during 1982, US coal burning released 155 times as much radioactivity into the atmosphere as the Three Mile Island incident.[5]
Burning coal also generates large amounts of fly ash and bottom ash.
Harvesting, processing, and distributing fossil fuels can also create environmental problems. Coal mining methods, particularly mountaintop removal and strip mining, have been causes for concern. While offshore oil drilling may create a hazard for aquatic organisms. Oil refineries (See Oil refinery) can pose threats to the environment. Transportation of coal requires the use of diesel-powered locomotives, while crude oil is typically transported by tanker ships. Each of these requires the combustion of fossil fuels.
Environmental regulation uses a variety of approaches to limit these emissions, such as command-and-control (which mandates the amount of pollution or the technology used), economic incentives, or voluntary programs.
Fossil-fuel subsidies
In economic terms, pollution from fossil fuels is regarded as a negative externality and should be taxed. This 'internalizes' the cost of pollution and makes fossil fuels more expensive, thereby reducing their use and the amount of pollution associated with them. Although European nations do impose some pollution taxes, they also give billions of subsidies to the fossil fuel industry, offsetting the taxes.
Although taxation may be one opinion on reducing their use its not conclusive by any measure.
- Fossil Fuel Subsidies in Europe
- US Fossil Fuel Subsidies
- 2003 Congressional briefing on fossil fuel subsidies
See also
- Abiogenic petroleum origin proposes that petroleum is not a fossil fuel
- Climate change
- Energy policy
- Flue gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion
- Greenhouse gas
- Global warming
- Hubbert peak theory
- List of energy topics
- Low-carbon economy
- Future energy development
- Radiative forcing
- Renewable energy
- World energy resources and consumption
- Proposed Oil phase-out in Sweden
References
- ^ Dr. Irene Novaczek. "Canada's Fossil Fuel Dependency". Elements. Retrieved 2007-01-18.
- ^ "Fossil fuel". EPA. Retrieved 2007-01-18.
- ^ US EPA.2000. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-1998, Rep. EPA 236-R-00-01. US EPA, Washington, DC, http://www.epa.gov/globalwarming
- ^ Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger - Alex Gabbard
- ^ Nuclear proliferation through coal burning - Gordon J. Aubrecht, II, Ohio State University
External links
- "EPA defines fossil fuel"
- "The Coming Energy Crisis?" - essay by James L. Williams of WTRG Economics and A. F. Alhajji of Ohio Northern University
- "Powering the Future" - Michael Parfit (National Geographic)
- "Will We Run Out of Energy ?" - article by Mark Bradley
- "Federal Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Greenhouse Gas Emissions"