Jump to content

Talk:The Antitrust Paradox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 05:57, 3 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Bork's law school dissertation?

[edit]

I vaguely remember that I saw some articles mentioning this as Bork's dissertation, is it true? Wandering Courier (talk) 16:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. THF (talk) 18:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Without anti-trust against IBM, there would have been no PC revolution

[edit]

And this post would not exist. There's a paradox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.102.148.154 (talk) 08:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Important Book?

[edit]

Why is it out of print when it has so many legal citations? LarryS500 (talk) 23:57, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago School

[edit]

Sorry, I don't know how wikipedia works, but there should be a link at the bottom for see also which links to the Chicago School of economics.