Jump to content

Talk:International Delphic Council

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 23:16, 3 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Organizations}}, {{WikiProject Russia}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I would like to request to you to reinstall the English Wikipedia – Site for the International Delphic Council (IDC). I have worked on the contents with new relevance. The organizations website is more relevance www.delphic.org where you can reach the Initiator. The idea of the initiator (International Delphic Council founded in 1994) is to revive the Delphic games but there have been some disloyal to rebel against, especially the Russians organizing International Delphi Committee (organized in 2003), they have use the counter subject “Committee” instead Council which is worldwide known. --Delphico (talk) 11:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article deletion controversies here and elsewhere

[edit]

For the record:

It has been asserted this organization was not notable. A Google News archive search turns up multiple references to this organization.
--A. B. (talkcontribs) 14:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the persecution, -- DarDar (talk) 12:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on International Delphic Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI?

[edit]

Could somebody who understands the subject matter please review the edits — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 19:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
There are thirty-five entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.
  • WP:ELCITE: access dates are not appropriate in the external links section. Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section. -- Otr500 (talk) 21:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]